From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 217–240 of 722 articles for “cir”

Cooperative Members' Deposit Interest Exempt from Final Withholding Tax: DCCCO v. CIR

The Supreme Court ruled that cooperatives need not withhold 20% final tax on members' deposit interest, citing social justice.

Tax Amnesty and the Mandatory Recording of Investigations: CIR v. Ariete

The Supreme Court ruled that BIR's failure to record an investigation in the Official Registry Book allows taxpayers to avail of tax amnesty benefits.

Rape Conviction Affirming Victim Testimony AND Ensuring Justice

Supreme Court affirms rape conviction based on credible victim testimony, explains qualifying circumstances and penalties under Philippine law.

Good Faith and Land Titles: Resolving Ownership Disputes in the Philippines

Learn how the Supreme Court balances Torrens titles against good faith in ownership disputes, and why buyers must investigate suspicious circumstances.

Eyewitness Identification Reliability and the Totality of Circumstances Test in Philippine Law

The Supreme Court explains when out-of-court eyewitness identification is reliable under the totality of circumstances test, and how in-court identification cures defects.

Zero-Rated Sales and VAT Refund Eligibility for Power Generation Companies

Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling in San Roque Power Corp. v. CIR on VAT refunds for zero-rated sales by power generators.

Witness Credibility AND Treachery IN Murder Examining Circumstantial Inconsistencies

Circumstantial Evidence in Rape Cases: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The Supreme Court explains how circumstantial evidence can establish rape beyond reasonable doubt, even when the victim was unconscious during the assault.

Mitigating Circumstances and Indeterminate Sentences: Balancing Justice and Individual Factors in Robbery Case

A Supreme Court ruling on how analogous mitigating circumstances and the Indeterminate Sentence Law shape penalties in robbery convictions.

Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Rape Case Built on Circumstantial Evidence

Supreme Court acquits rape accused where prosecution evidence failed to overcome reasonable doubt, emphasizing rigorous scrutiny of complainant's testimony.

Reasonable Doubt and Rape Allegations: Lessons from People v. Bacus on Circumstantial Evidence

When can physical impossibility and medical findings overcome a rape accusation? The Supreme Court's acquittal in People v. Bacus explains.

Protecting the Vulnerable: Convicting Child Abusers Beyond Reasonable Doubt

In Rimando v. People, the Supreme Court upheld a father's rape conviction, showing how circumstantial evidence and a child's testimony can prove guilt beyond doubt.

Upholding Honesty IN Public Service Falsification OF Time Records AND Mitigating Circumstances IN Administrative Cases

Willful Failure to Pay Just Debts: Court Employee Suspended After Third Offense

Supreme Court suspends court employee for six months for willful failure to pay a just debt, clarifying standards for administrative liability and mitigating circumstances.

Confession as Key Evidence in Rape with Homicide: The Weight of Judicial Admission

How a voluntary confession and circumstantial evidence secured a rape-with-homicide conviction, and what this means for criminal cases.

Carnapping Penalties: The Critical Importance of Allegations in the Information

In Andres v. People, the Supreme Court lowered a carnapping penalty because the Information failed to allege the qualifying circumstances proven at trial.

Accountability for Deadly Assault: Distinguishing Frustrated Homicide from Murder Through Intent and Circumsta

The Supreme Court clarifies when a near-fatal bolo attack is frustrated homicide versus murder, and how intent and treachery are proven.

Marital Discord and Deadly Conspiracy: Establishing Parricide Through Circumstantial Evidence

Explore how Philippine courts convict parricide when a spouse conspires with a lover to kill, relying on circumstantial evidence.

Shared Intent, Shared Liability: Understanding Conspiracy in Philippine Murder Cases

A Philippine Supreme Court ruling on murder, treachery, and voluntary surrender shows how intent and circumstance shape criminal liability and damages.

Mispleading Relationship in Rape Cases: Impact on Qualifying Circumstances

When an information misstates the offender's relationship to the victim, a qualifying circumstance fails, reducing rape to its simple form.

Intentional Burning and Syndicate Aggravation: Defining Arson and Its Penalties in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies arson's elements and the syndicate aggravating circumstance that raises the penalty to reclusion perpetua.

Newspaper Circulation and Foreclosure: Ensuring Public Notice in Property Sales

Supreme Court nullifies foreclosure sale because notice was published in a newspaper not circulated in the city where the property was located.

Psychological Incapacity Reassessing Marital Nullity Under Article 36 of the Family Code

The Supreme Court clarifies that psychological incapacity under Article 36 need not fit rigid molds, urging a case-by-case, totality-of-circumstances approach.

Falsifying Personal Data Sheets: Dishonesty in Public Service and Its Penalties

The Supreme Court ruled that falsifying entries in a government employee's Personal Data Sheet constitutes dishonesty, but mitigating circumstances may reduce the penalty of dismissal.