From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 313–336 of 541 articles for “judges”

Upholding Judicial Integrity: The Limits of Administrative Complaints Against Judges

The Supreme Court clarifies when administrative complaints against judges proceed despite withdrawal, and distinguishes venue in criminal versus civil cases.

Detailing Municipal Employees to Courts: Limits of Executive Judge Authority

Supreme Court clarifies when executive judges may detail personnel to courts, and why municipal employees cannot serve as sheriffs.

Setting Bail Judges Must Consider Offenders Finances

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on bail discretion, judicial misconduct, and the duty of judges to resist pressure when setting bail.

Accountability Unbarred: Can Lawyers Face Discipline for Past Actions?

Supreme Court rules lawyers may face discipline for misconduct committed long ago, even after becoming judges or retiring.

Judicial Accountability: Timeliness and Due Diligence in Court Proceedings

A Supreme Court ruling shows judges can be fined for delaying cases and mishandling records, underscoring the judiciary's duty of competence and diligence.

Judicial Immunity: When Judges Cannot Be Sued for Official Acts

The Supreme Court dismissed an administrative complaint against three Sandiganbayan justices, reaffirming that judges are shielded from suits over official acts done in good faith.

Judicial Independence vs Administrative Oversight: Striking the Balance in Philippine Courts

The Supreme Court clarifies when judges and sheriffs face administrative liability, protecting judicial independence while ensuring accountability.

Judicial Accountability: Timely Resolution of Cases and Public Trust

The Supreme Court fined four RTC judges for delayed decisions, underscoring that judges must decide cases within 90 days or face administrative sanctions.

Judge Dismissed for Gross Ignorance of Law in Election Protest and Criminal Cases

Supreme Court holds judges accountable for gross ignorance of law, due process violations, and failure to transmit criminal case records to prosecutors.

Dismissal OF Administrative Complaints Substantiating Claims Against Judges

Upholding Judicial Decorum Judges Must Treat Lawyers AND Litigants With Courtesy

Bail Denied A Judges Duty TO Hear Evidence IN Capital Offenses

Hold-Departure Orders, Judicial Misconduct, and the Cost of Ignorance of the Law

Administrative case clarifies when judges may issue hold-departure orders — and the penalties for getting it wrong.

When Judges Can't Serve as Attorneys-in-Fact: Fiduciary Limits Under the Code of Judicial Conduct

The Supreme Court clarifies when a judge's private role as attorney-in-fact violates judicial ethics, even for relatives.

Administrative Case Penalties: When Good Faith and Long Service Can Reduce a Judge's Fine

Philippine Supreme Court explains mitigating circumstances in administrative cases against judges, reducing fines based on service record.

Immorality and Judicial Conduct: Substantiation of Charges in Administrative Cases

A Supreme Court ruling on when judges face administrative liability, the need for substantial evidence, and the duty to avoid impropriety.

Judicial Accountability Penalizing Judges for Gross Ignorance of the Law

A look at how Philippine courts hold judges accountable for gross ignorance of the law, with key principles and practical implications.

Judicial Accountability: Judges Must Respect Due Process and Avoid Abusive Language

A judge's intemperate language toward lawyers violates judicial decorum. The Supreme Court explains the limits of judicial discretion and accountability.

Judicial Independence: Why Unfounded Administrative Complaints Against Judges Fail

The Supreme Court shields judges from baseless administrative suits, clarifying that judicial errors are corrected by appeal, not discipline.

Judicial Overreach When Judges Overstep Bail Authority

Explore how the Supreme Court nullified a COMELEC en banc ruling for violating the constitutional rule on division jurisdiction in election cases.

Summary Procedure Deadlines Binding on Judges; Self-Representation Not Law Practice

Court rules on judge's delay in ejectment case and clerk of court's right to self-representation versus appearing for co-plaintiff.

Moral Turpitude and Professional Responsibility: When a Lawyer's Personal Conduct Affects Their Career

Philippine Supreme Court suspends lawyer for two years for immorality and for creating the appearance of influencing judges.

Exhaustion of Judicial Remedies Before Administrative Complaints Against Judges

Philippine doctrine: administrative complaints against judges for unjust judgments require prior exhaustion of judicial remedies like appeal or certiorari.

Neglect of Duty: Accountability for Process Servers in the Philippine Judiciary

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies the difference between simple and gross neglect of duty for court process servers, and the limits of executive judges' disciplinary powers.