Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Victim Testimony and Alibi Defense Scrutiny in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, explaining why a credible victim's testimony prevails over alibi and denial defenses.
Incestuous Rape: Supreme Court Upholds Convictions, Reduces Death Penalty
The Supreme Court affirms incestuous rape convictions but reduces death sentences to reclusion perpetua, clarifying penalty rules and victim rights.
Gross Ignorance of the Law: Judge Fined for Libel Prelim Investigation Without Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court fines an MTC judge P5,000 for gross ignorance of the law after he conducted a preliminary investigation in a libel case outside his jurisdiction.
When One Eyewitness Is Enough: Conviction for Homicide Despite Alibi and Denial
The Supreme Court explains when a single eyewitness's testimony can convict, and why the killing was homicide, not murder.
Gross Ignorance of Law: Judge Fined for Acting Beyond Jurisdiction in Libel Case
A judge's mistaken assumption of jurisdiction in a libel preliminary investigation results in a P5,000 fine for gross ignorance of the law.
Circumstantial Evidence and Murder Convictions: The People vs. Diaz Case
Learn how the Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence in People vs. Diaz, and what this means for Philippine criminal law.
Judges and Lawyers Face Strict Accountability for Extramarital Affairs
The Supreme Court dismissed a judge for gross immorality over an extramarital affair, showing that private misconduct can end a judicial career.
Rape and Mental Capacity: Understanding the Burden of Proof in Philippine Law
A Supreme Court acquittal clarifies when mental retardation must be proven to convict in rape cases, and why the prosecution's burden matters.
Jurisdictional Estoppel: When a Party Can No Longer Question a Court’s Authority
Explaining the doctrine of estoppel by laches and when a party is barred from questioning a court's jurisdiction after actively participating in the case.
Bus Company's Liability: The Duty to Supervise Employees and Prevent Negligence
A bus firm must prove diligence in supervising drivers to avoid liability for their negligence. Victory Liner case explained.
The Right to Confrontation: Why Live Testimony Matters in Philippine Criminal Trials
The Supreme Court vacated a rape conviction because prosecutors used transcripts from another trial instead of presenting live witnesses, violating the accused's right to confrontation.
Right to Information: Accused Cannot Be Convicted of a Crime Not Clearly Charged
The Supreme Court reinstates a rape case, ruling an information need only state the essential elements, not every detail.
Why Precise Rape Charges Matter: The Right to Be Informed of the Accusation
The Supreme Court nullified rape convictions where complaints said only "sexual abuse," upholding the accused's constitutional right to know the charge.
Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When Facebook Posts Are Crimes
The Supreme Court affirms that demeaning Facebook posts can constitute psychological abuse under RA 9262, with higher penalties for ICT use.
Prescription of Penalties: Why Actual Imprisonment Matters in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when prescription of penalties begins—only after a convict actually escapes from imprisonment.
Rape Conviction Intoxication AND Credibility OF Victims Testimony
Prescription of Penalties: Evasion of Sentence Requires Prior Imprisonment
Philippine Supreme Court ruling: prescription of penalty starts only when a convicted person escapes from actual imprisonment, not from hiding.
Proving Minority in Qualified Rape Cases: The Ochea Standard
In People v. Ochea, the Supreme Court ruled that failure to prove the victim's minority bars conviction for qualified rape and the death penalty.
When Proof of Age Fails: Simple Rape Instead of Death in People v. Ochea
The Supreme Court reduced a death sentence to reclusion perpetua because prosecutors failed to prove the victim's minority in a rape case.
Treachery in Criminal Law: The Imperative of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Murder Convictions
Understand how Philippine courts treat treachery claims and why proof beyond reasonable doubt remains the gold standard in murder cases.
Treachery Defined: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Sudden Attacks in the Philippines
The Supreme Court clarifies treachery and self-defense in sudden attacks, affirming that bare claims of self-defense cannot overcome clear evidence of guilt.
Rape Conviction Upheld Despite Vague Date in Information: People v. Cantomayor
The Supreme Court upheld a father's rape conviction even though the information alleged only "on or about the year 1990," clarifying when the date of the crime really matters.
Credibility of the Victim's Lone Testimony in Rape Cases: People v. Bitancor
In People v. Bitancor, the Supreme Court upheld a rape conviction based solely on the victim's credible testimony, reaffirming a doctrine that guides Philippine courts.
Conspiracy and Consent: Examining the Elements of Rape in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies rape elements, consent, and qualifying circumstances in a father's conviction for raping his 10-year-old daughter.