Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Eyewitness Testimony and Credibility in Murder Cases: The Noel Lee Case
How Philippine courts weigh eyewitness credibility, alibi, and treachery in murder convictions, explained through the Noel Lee case.
Rape: Proving Minority and Relationship for a Qualified Rape Conviction
The Supreme Court reduced a death sentence to reclusion perpetua because the victim's age and the offender's relationship to her were not properly alleged and proven.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Witness Testimony Enough Despite Victim's Mental State
Supreme Court affirms rape conviction based on eyewitness testimony, ruling a victim's mental incapacity does not weaken prosecution evidence.
Treachery in Criminal Law: The Element of Surprise and Defenseless Victims
Understand treachery in Philippine criminal law through People v. Zeta, where the Supreme Court explains why surprise at the inception of attack matters.
Treachery in Criminal Law: The Element of Surprise in Murder Convictions
Philippine Supreme Court explains why treachery requires proof of deliberate surprise, not just multiple stab wounds.
Credibility of Rape Victims: Affidavit of Desistance and Delay in Reporting
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on why delayed reporting and affidavits of desistance do not automatically destroy a rape victim's credibility.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Intimidation With a Weapon Constitutes Force in Sexual Assault
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, ruling that threatening a victim with a bolo constitutes the force or intimidation required by law.
Judicial Overreach: The Limits of Hold-Departure Orders and the Right to Travel
A judge who issued a hold-departure order beyond his court's jurisdiction was fined by the Supreme Court for violating Circular 39-97.
Treachery in Criminal Law: Why the Element of Surprise Is Essential for Conviction
Philippine Supreme Court explains why treachery requires proof of deliberate surprise attack, not just multiple stab wounds.
Rape of a Demented Person: Conviction Upheld Without Victim's Testimony
Supreme Court affirms rape conviction of a demented victim's uncle based on circumstantial evidence, despite the victim's inability to testify.
When Do Labor Tribunals Have Jurisdiction Over Employer Claims? Esico v. Alphaland
The Supreme Court clarifies when labor tribunals, not regular courts, hear employer claims for damages arising from an employee's resignation.
Online Posts as VAWC Abuse: When Social Media Use Raises the Penalty
The Supreme Court clarifies how Facebook posts can prove psychological abuse under RA 9262 and why ICT use raises penalties.
Improvident Plea and Admissibility of Extrajudicial Confession in Rape with Homicide Cases
When a guilty plea is improvident, conviction may still stand on other evidence—here, a valid extrajudicial confession and circumstantial proof.
Acquittal in Rape With Homicide: When Reasonable Doubt Prevails
The Supreme Court acquitted Antonio Silvano of rape with homicide, showing why hearsay confessions and weak circumstantial evidence cannot sustain a conviction.
Extrajudicial Confessions and Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Criminal Cases
Learn when an alleged confession to a private person is admissible and why circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain to convict.
Sheriffs, Foreclosure, and the Duty to Follow Court Procedure
In Ta-Octa v. Eguia, the Supreme Court fined two sheriffs for skipping the mandatory raffle in an extrajudicial foreclosure, stressing strict compliance with court rules.
Judicial Accountability: Fines for Sheriffs Who Skip Raffle in Foreclosure Cases
Supreme Court fines sheriffs P1,000 each for failing to raffle an extrajudicial foreclosure petition, underscoring strict compliance with court procedure.
Credibility in Rape Cases: Why Victim Testimony Carries Decisive Weight
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, underscoring that a victim's credible, positive testimony outweighs alibi and improbable claims.
Credibility of Witness Testimony in Rape Cases: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How Philippine courts assess witness credibility in rape cases, explained through People v. Lopez, where a child victim's testimony prevailed over alibi.
Rape Conviction Affirmed: Victim Testimony and Use of Force in Philippine Rape Cases
Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, explaining why a victim's testimony can stand even without physical injuries or fresh lacerations.
The Testimony of the Victim and the Crime of Rape: Assessing Credibility and Impact on Conviction
A look at how the Supreme Court weighs a rape victim's testimony against alibi and denial, affirming conviction based on credibility.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Father Figure's Moral Ascendancy Equals Force and Intimidation
Philippine Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, ruling that a father figure's moral ascendancy over a minor victim substitutes for force and intimidation.
Treachery in Criminal Law: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Unforeseen Attacks
When can treachery qualify a killing as murder? The Supreme Court explains the strict proof required for this aggravating circumstance.
Treachery in Criminal Law: Establishing Intent and Lack of Opportunity for Self-Defense
The Supreme Court explains how treachery qualifies a killing as murder, focusing on the victim's inability to defend and the attacker's deliberate method.