Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Voluntary Surrender as a Mitigating Factor in Murder Cases
The Supreme Court explains when voluntary surrender qualifies as a mitigating circumstance in murder, reducing the penalty from death to reclusion perpetua.
Circumstantial Evidence and Parricide: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How circumstantial evidence can prove parricide beyond reasonable doubt, and when aggravating circumstances cannot raise the penalty to death.
Judicial Accountability When Misinterpreting Circulars Leads to Liability
Supreme Court clarifies that Circular No. 3-89 covers only administrative cases, not criminal cases against judges; a judge's misinterpretation can result in administrative liability.
When Advertising Costs Become Capital Expenditures: Lessons from CIR v. General Foods
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when large advertising expenses are deductible business costs or capital outlays for goodwill.
Treachery in Robbery With Homicide: Supreme Court Clarifies Aggravating Circumstances
The Supreme Court clarifies that treachery can aggravate robbery with homicide when the victim is killed treacherously, affecting penalty imposition.
Judicial Accountability When Judges Overstep Supervisory Bounds and Circumvent Due Process
A Supreme Court ruling on when reprimanding a complainant violates due process, and why withdrawing an administrative complaint does not end the case.
Circumventing Disqualification Orders Through Consultancy Contracts Warrants Lawyer Suspension
Lawyer suspended for violating court disqualification by serving as "consultant" to government agency while performing employee duties.
Child Witness Credibility in Rape Cases: Why Qualifying Circumstances Must Be Alleged
How Philippine courts assess a child rape victim's testimony and why unalleged qualifying circumstances reduce the penalty to reclusion perpetua.
Judicial Authority and Limits: A Judge's Jurisdiction After Temporary Reassignment
Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling on a judge's notarial powers, the limits of judicial authority, and the importance of following SC Circular No. 1-90.
Conspiracy Unmasked When Silence Implies Guilt IN Murder AND Kidnapping Cases
The Supreme Court explains how circumstantial evidence and silence can establish conspiracy in murder and kidnapping cases.
Circumstantial Evidence and Murder Convictions: The People vs. Diaz Case
Learn how the Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence in People vs. Diaz, and what this means for Philippine criminal law.
Reasonable Doubt Acquittal in Rape with Homicide Based on Circumstantial Evidence
Supreme Court acquits rape-homicide accused where circumstantial evidence failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Conspiracy and Consent: Examining the Elements of Rape in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies rape elements, consent, and qualifying circumstances in a father's conviction for raping his 10-year-old daughter.
Accountability in Robbery: Establishing Conspiracy and Liability in Complex Crimes
A bus robbery turned deadly. The Court explains conspiracy liability in robbery with homicide, and why the aggravating circumstance of band was not proved.
Proving Online Abuse: Social Media Evidence in VAWC Cases
How the Supreme Court allows circumstantial evidence to prove authorship of harmful social media posts in psychological abuse cases.
Treachery Unveiled: The Standard for Qualifying Circumstances in Criminal Law
The Supreme Court clarifies that treachery must be proven with equal certainty as the crime itself, not presumed from the killing.
Shifting Sands of Evidence: Drug Sale Convictions and the Weight of Testimony
A look at how the Supreme Court weighs conflicting police testimonies in drug busts, and why aggravating circumstances must be alleged in the information.
Treachery and Unlicensed Firearms: Navigating Murder and Frustrated Murder Convictions
The Supreme Court clarifies treachery, unlicensed firearm aggravating circumstances, and penalties in murder and frustrated murder cases.
Circumstantial Evidence and the Presumption of Innocence: Lessons from People v. Asis
In People v. Asis, the Supreme Court acquitted two deaf-mute defendants after finding that circumstantial evidence and an illegal search failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
How Youth and Voluntary Surrender Affect Criminal Liability in the Philippines
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when voluntary surrender is a mitigating circumstance and how self-defense claims are judged.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails When Incomplete Cross Examination Leads TO Acquittal
Explore how incomplete cross-examination and weak circumstantial evidence led the Supreme Court to acquit in a rape-homicide case.
Intoxication as a Mitigating Circumstance in Murder Cases: Reassessing Criminal Liability
The Supreme Court clarifies how intoxication and voluntary surrender affect criminal liability, downgrading murder to homicide in a landmark 2002 ruling.
Improvident Guilty Pleas: Protecting Rights in Capital Offenses
A guilty plea does not admit aggravating circumstances; the prosecution must still prove them, as shown in People v. Gutierrez.
Qualified Carnapping and the Death Penalty: People v. Lobitania Explained
The Supreme Court affirms the death penalty for a police officer convicted of qualified carnapping with murder, clarifying aggravating circumstances under Philippine law.