Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Partition Rights CO Ownership VS Prior Judgment IN Philippine Property LAW
Supreme Court clarifies that a default judgment cannot substitute for proof of co-ownership, and a tax declaration alone does not establish title.
Injunctions and Mortgage Foreclosure: Balancing Creditor Rights and Preventing Irreparable Harm
The Supreme Court clarifies when preliminary injunctions may stop mortgage foreclosures, emphasizing that courts must protect only rights that clearly exist.
Default Judgments and Due Process: Proving Ownership Claims in Philippine Courts
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that default judgments still require proof of claims, and bare allegations cannot establish ownership of property.
Bigamy and the Need for a Judicial Declaration of Nullity Before Remarriage
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that contracting a second marriage without first securing a judicial declaration of nullity of the first constitutes bigamy.
Chain of Custody and the Presumption of Innocence in Philippine Drug Cases
Why the Supreme Court acquitted a drug suspect when police broke the chain of custody rule.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: When Police Lapses Lead to Acquittal
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that police non-compliance with Section 21, RA 9165 chain of custody rules can defeat drug prosecutions.
Writ of Possession and Third-Party Rights in Extrajudicial Foreclosure Sales
When can a writ of possession be issued despite a third party's possession of foreclosed property? The Supreme Court clarifies the rule.
Bidding Rules and Government's Right to Reject: Protecting Public Interest in Privatization
Supreme Court affirms government's right to reject bids in privatization auctions, protecting public interest over bidder expectations.
Reinstatement vs Return to Work: Clarifying Employment Rights After a Transfer
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that reinstatement only applies to illegal dismissal, while a valid transfer requires a return to work order.
When Illegal Strike Actions Override Reinstatement Orders: Supervening Events in Labor Law
The Supreme Court clarifies when a final reinstatement order may yield to supervening events, including findings of illegal strike acts.
Untimely Appeal Strict Deadlines For VAT Refund Claims In The Philippines
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120-day and 30-day deadlines for VAT refund claims, including the exception for premature judicial filings.
Warrantless Arrest and Admissibility of Evidence: Safeguarding Rights in Drug Cases
The Supreme Court explains when a warrantless arrest is lawful and how evidence seized incident to that arrest remains admissible in drug cases.
Duress in Mortgage Contracts: Reasonable Fear and Legal Claims Under Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when fear or duress voids a mortgage, and why threatening a legal claim does not vitiate consent.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Child Witness Credibility and the Hymenal Laceration Myth
The Supreme Court affirms a grandfather's qualified rape conviction, holding that an intact hymen does not negate rape and that a child's credible testimony suffices.
Termination Due to Illness in the Philippines: Balancing Employer Rights and Employee Protection
The Supreme Court clarifies when employers may validly terminate employees due to disease, and the procedural due process required under Philippine labor law.
Strict Compliance: The Mandatory Nature of VAT Refund Periods Under the NIRC
The Supreme Court rules that the 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims are mandatory and jurisdictional, dismissing a belated judicial claim.
Credibility of Child Testimony in Rape Cases: When Doubt Leads to Acquittal
The Supreme Court acquitted a rape accused due to reasonable doubt, examining how courts must scrutinize child testimony and prosecution evidence.
When a Writ of Possession Is Ministerial: The Sombilon Case on Foreclosure and Lawyers' Purchase Limits
The Supreme Court clarifies when courts must issue writs of possession after foreclosure and whether lawyers may buy property from banks.
Ministerial Duty and Abuse of Authority: Understanding the Writ of Possession and Judicial Misconduct
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a writ of possession is ministerial, and when a judge's discretion becomes grave abuse of authority.
Treachery Defined: The Element of Surprise in Murder Cases
The Supreme Court explains how sudden, unexpected attacks constitute treachery, qualifying killings as murder under Philippine law.
Spousal Support and Retirement Benefits: Protection Orders Under R.A. 9262
The Supreme Court rules that R.A. 9262 protection orders can compel the AFP to withhold retirement benefits for spousal support.
Writ of Possession Is Ministerial: Court Limits on Judges' Discretion in Foreclosure Cases
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies writ of possession is ministerial after foreclosure, and judges who delay it face administrative sanctions.
Writ of Possession as Ministerial Duty: Court Ruling on Judicial Discretion and Liability
Supreme Court clarifies writ of possession is a ministerial duty, and judges who defer it may face administrative liability.
Final Judgments Must Stand: The Doctrine of Immutability and Compromise Agreements
A final judgment on a compromise agreement is immutable. The Supreme Court explains why parties cannot relitigate settled cases.