Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Moral Turpitude and Lawyer Disbarment: Issuing a Bouncing Check
A lawyer's conviction for issuing a bouncing check under BP 22 involves moral turpitude and warrants disbarment, the Supreme Court ruled.
Bouncing Checks Law: When Fear and Necessity Do Not Excuse Issuing Bad Checks
The Supreme Court clarifies when uncontrollable fear and state of necessity cannot excuse liability under the Bouncing Checks Law.
Bouncing Checks and Subsidiary Imprisonment: What BP 22 Violators Face
Can a BP 22 violator be jailed for failing to pay fines? The Supreme Court explains subsidiary imprisonment rules.
Bouncing Checks and Broken Promises: Proving Guilt in B.P. 22 Cases
A Supreme Court ruling explains how photocopies of bounced checks can convict a drawer under B.P. 22, and when imprisonment is proper.
Worthless Checks Valid Debt BP 22 Applies Despite Payee Discrepancies
Supreme Court affirms BP 22 convictions for worthless checks, ruling that payee discrepancies do not negate liability for issuing bouncing checks.
Bouncing Checks and Corporate Liability: Understanding BP 22 in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies that under BP 22, the reason for issuing a bouncing check is immaterial to criminal liability. Learn the rules.
Bouncing Checks and Broken Promises: When Deceit Fails in Estafa and BP 22 Cases
The Supreme Court explains when issuing bouncing checks constitutes estafa or BP 22 violations—and why notice of dishonor matters.
B.P. 22 Conviction Requires Proof of Written Notice of Dishonor: The Sia Case
Conviction under the Bouncing Checks Law requires proof the accused received written notice of dishonor. The Sia case explains why.
Bouncing Checks and the Limits of Criminal Liability Under BP 22
The Supreme Court clarifies when payment before notice of dishonor acquits a drawer, and the fine limits under BP 22.
Upholding Ethical Standards: Immorality as Grounds for Disciplinary Action Against Court Personnel
A lawyer's issuance of a bouncing check constitutes deceit and gross misconduct, warranting suspension from the practice of law.
Lawyer Suspended for Issuing Bouncing Check to Settle Client's Case
Lawyer who issued a bouncing check to settle a client's civil liability was suspended for two years for deceit and violating the Lawyer's Oath.
Bouncing Checks and Due Process: The Notice of Dishonor Requirement in BP 22 Cases
The Supreme Court acquits a BP 22 accused because the prosecution failed to prove notice of dishonor was served on the drawer.
Checks AS Guarantee Lagman VS People When A Bounced Check Becomes A Crime
The Supreme Court clarifies when a check issued as a guarantee, not payment, falls under the Bouncing Checks Law.
Insufficient Notice, Insufficient Funds: Safeguarding Rights in Bouncing Check Cases
A Supreme Court ruling explains why proper written notice of dishonor is essential before a person can be convicted under the Bouncing Checks Law.
Bouncing Checks and the Breadth of BP 22: Understanding so that its dishonor becomes a crime? The case is a us
The Facts of the Case Miraflor San Pedro and Evelyn Odra were friends and business associates. Odra entrusted San Pedro with Pyrex cooking utensils to sell. Ov
Bouncing Checks and Estafa: How Issuing Worthless Checks Can Lead to Fraud Convictions
Learn how issuing postdated checks with closed accounts can result in both B.P. 22 violations and estafa convictions under Philippine law.
Bouncing Checks LAW Compensation AS A Defense AND THE Impact OF Administrative Circular 12 2000
Prior Payment of Check Value as Defense in Bouncing Checks Cases
When does paying the check amount before prosecution bar a B.P. 22 conviction? The Supreme Court explains in Griffith v. Court of Appeals.
Bouncing Checks and Broken Promises: Estafa and BP 22 in the Philippines
A Supreme Court ruling explains when a bouncing check leads to both estafa and BP 22 violations, and how penalties are computed.
Spousal Liability in Estafa: Why Marriage Alone Does Not Prove Guilt
Supreme Court ruling: a husband's mere presence when his wife issued a bouncing check does not prove conspiracy in estafa.
Moral Turpitude and Bouncing Checks: Disqualifying Election Candidates in the Philippines
The Supreme Court rules that conviction for violation of B.P. Blg. 22 (Bouncing Checks Law) involves moral turpitude, disqualifying candidates from public office.
Bouncing Checks AND Criminal Liability Strict Enforcement OF BP 22
Bouncing Checks Law: When Issuing Postdated Checks Leads to Imprisonment
The Supreme Court affirms imprisonment for twelve counts of B.P. 22 violations, clarifying when fines alone are insufficient and why each worthless check is a separate offense.
Contractual Obligations Prevail: Bouncing Checks and Prejudicial Questions in Philippine Law
When do civil disputes suspend criminal cases for bouncing checks? The Supreme Court clarifies the rule on prejudicial questions in Sabandal v. Tongco.