From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 11809–11832 of 18,238 articles for “supreme court”

Quasi-Delict Damages and Court Jurisdiction: Filing in the Right Philippine Court

Learn how Philippine courts determine jurisdiction in quasi-delict damage claims, based on the Supreme Court ruling in Iniego v. Purganan.

Office Rules Matter When Tardiness Isnt Absenteeism In Philippine Courts

Supreme Court clarifies that an administrative circular on habitual absenteeism cannot be used to discipline mere tardiness. Learn the distinction.

Proving Work-Related Illness in the Philippines: When Is Diabetes Compensable

Diabetes is not automatically compensable under Philippine law. A Supreme Court ruling shows what proof claimants must present.

When Can Courts Halt Government Infrastructure Projects? The Hernandez Ruling

The Supreme Court explains when courts may issue injunctions against government infrastructure projects despite PD 1818.

Employee Dismissal: Gross Negligence and Loss of Trust in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when gross negligence and loss of trust justify employee dismissal, and when they do not.

Lawyer Fined for Shouting at Court Staff and Defying IBP Orders

Supreme Court imposes fines on lawyer for disrespecting court personnel and disobeying IBP directives, reinforcing ethical standards for attorneys.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: High Court Clarifies Social Media Evidence and Penalties

Supreme Court affirms conviction for online psychological abuse under RA 9262, sets guidelines on proving social media authorship, and raises penalty for ICT use.

Ejectment Suits: Prior Physical Possession Decides Property Disputes

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that in ejectment cases, prior physical possession—not ownership—determines who stays. Learn the rules from Guanga v. Dela Cruz.

Unmasking Fraud in Property Deals: Supreme Court Clarifies Burden of Proof

The Supreme Court clarifies that fraud in property sales must be proven with clear evidence, not bare allegations.

Filing Administrative Cases Against Judges: When Is a Judge Liable for an Unjust Judgment

Philippine Supreme Court explains when judges face administrative liability for erroneous rulings and the duty to answer complaints.

Power Back On: Your Rights to Electricity Reconnection in the Philippines

When can a power company cut your electricity, and can you get it restored? A Supreme Court ruling clarifies your rights.

Philippine Party List Seat Allocation: The Supreme Court's Formula Explained

Learn how the Supreme Court computes party-list seats in the Philippines, and why the Veterans formula remains the governing rule.

Bounced Checks and Broken Promises: Understanding Estafa Liability in Philippine Transactions

When do bounced checks create criminal liability for estafa? The Supreme Court clarifies who can be held liable under Article 315.

Inadvertent Misrepresentation as a Lawyer: When It Is Not Contempt of Court in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that inadvertent misrepresentation as a lawyer without intent to practice is not indirect contempt.

Chain of Custody Is Key: How Mishandled Evidence Can Undermine Drug Cases in the Philippines

A Supreme Court ruling shows how poor court records management delays justice, and why drug cases demand stricter handling of evidence and dockets.

Habeas Corpus and Mootness: When Release Ends a Petition in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court explains when a detainee's release renders a habeas corpus petition moot, with practical guidance.

Attorney Accountability Understanding Lawyer Negligence AND Upholding Client Trust IN THE Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court suspends lawyer for gross negligence, explaining counsel's duties of fidelity, diligence, and proper withdrawal under the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Employer-Employee Relationship Is Key to Labor Jurisdiction in Illegal Dismissal Cases

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on why employer-employee relationship is jurisdictional in illegal dismissal cases and when corporate officers can be held liable.

Court Personnel Extortion: Dismissal for Misappropriation of Court Funds

Supreme Court ruling on court employee extortion and misappropriation of court documents, explaining penalties under the new Code of Conduct.

Personal Liability for Business Debts: Surety and Co-Maker Obligations in Philippine Loans

Learn when Philippine courts hold corporate officers personally liable as sureties or co-makers on business loans, based on a Supreme Court ruling.

Sheriff Misconduct: When Overzealous Court Service Becomes a Liability

Philippine Supreme Court rules on sheriff misconduct when overzealous implementation of court orders and service of pleadings exceeds authority.

Public Servants Must Pay Just Debts: A Lesson in Integrity in Philippine Public Office

Philippine Supreme Court ruling: public employees face reprimand for willful failure to pay just debts, upholding integrity in public service.

Salary Standardization Law: When Allowance Integration Is Valid Under RA 6758

Explaining the Supreme Court ruling that NPC's integration of employee welfare allowance into salaries under RA 6758 was valid, and why mandamus failed.

Red Flags in Permit Applications: Avoiding Administrative Liability for Public Officials

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on Bedruz v. Ombudsman explains how approving permits with glaring defects can make public officials administratively liable.