From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1417–1440 of 1,803 articles for “evidence”

Circumstantial Evidence and Murder Conviction: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Explaining how circumstantial evidence can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in murder cases, citing People v. Diaz.

Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Navigating the Perils of Drug Sale Convictions in the Philippines

Learn how Philippine courts assess drug sale cases, the burden of proof, and why credible evidence matters in convictions.

The Fine Line: Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Criminal Cases

A Supreme Court ruling on conspiracy, evidence, and the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt in criminal prosecutions.

Proving a Lost Lease with Secondary Evidence and Ejectment Rights in Philippine Law

How Philippine courts allow secondary evidence to prove a lost lease contract, and when a lessor may eject a non-paying tenant.

When Silence Speaks Volumes: Flight as Evidence of Guilt in Homicide Cases

In People v. Yungot, the Supreme Court explains how flight after a crime can strengthen the prosecution's case and weaken an alibi defense.

Guilt Beyond Doubt: Circumstantial Evidence and Illegal Firearms in Murder Conviction

How the Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence and illegal firearms possession under PD 1866.

Reasonable Doubt and Circumstantial Evidence: When Suspicion Cannot Sustain a Conviction

The Supreme Court acquits five police officers of double murder, explaining when circumstantial evidence fails the test of moral certainty.

Reasonable Doubt and Circumstantial Evidence in Rape with Homicide Cases

The Supreme Court acquits two accused in a rape with homicide case, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Rape with Homicide Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence

Supreme Court acquits two men convicted of rape with homicide, ruling circumstantial evidence failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Chain of Circumstances Establishing Guilt in Robbery With Homicide Cases

How circumstantial evidence, not direct eyewitness testimony, can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in robbery with homicide cases.

Dying Declarations and Circumstantial Evidence Proving Homicide Beyond Reasonable Doubt

When a dying victim names her assailant, that statement can convict—but only if the prosecution proves every element beyond reasonable doubt.

Buy-Bust Operations: Admissibility of Evidence and Validity of Warrantless Arrests in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies that buy-bust operations need no marked money or prior surveillance; warrantless arrests in flagrante delicto are valid.

Incestuous Rape: Why Philippine Courts Trust Child Victims' Testimony

Philippine Supreme Court affirms death penalty for incestuous rape, explaining why a child victim's testimony is credible evidence.

Establishing Filiation: The Imperative of Conclusive Evidence in Inheritance Disputes

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on proving filiation in inheritance cases, highlighting the need for conclusive evidence and final judgments.

Entrapment vs Frame-Up: Weighing Evidence in Philippine Drug Cases

The Supreme Court explains how courts distinguish legitimate entrapment from frame-up in drug cases, and why positive identification prevails over denial.

Rape Conviction Upheld: Victim Testimony and Medical Evidence Suffice for Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Explore how the Supreme Court affirmed a rape conviction, relying on credible victim testimony and medical findings over alibi defenses.

Bouncing Checks and Due Process: When Is a Waiver Really a Waiver

A look at when a court may declare a defendant's right to present evidence waived, and the penalties for bouncing checks under B.P. 22.

When Medical Evidence Is Absent: Conviction for Rape Based on Victim's Testimony

The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction despite normal medical findings, explaining why a child victim's testimony can be enough.

Circumstantial Evidence and Conviction: When Proof Falls Short of Rape With Homicide

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when circumstantial evidence suffices for homicide but not rape with homicide conviction.

Circumstantial Evidence and Robbery With Homicide: Establishing Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

How the Supreme Court upheld a robbery-with-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, flight, and denial in People v. Corre Jr.

When Corporate Veil Claims Fail: Lessons from the Behest Loan Case

The Supreme Court explains when the Ombudsman may dismiss fraud complaints against corporate officers and why evidence of conspiracy matters.

Corporate Governance and Stockholder Rights: Lessons from Marubeni v. Lirag

The Supreme Court clarifies that stockholders must prove their claims by preponderance of evidence and cannot rely on speculation or corporate veil piercing.

Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Estafa Case on Insufficient Evidence and Hearsay

Supreme Court acquits pawnshop owner in estafa case, ruling that hearsay evidence and uncorroborated testimony cannot overcome the presumption of innocence.

Upholding Land Ownership Claims: The Importance of Evidentiary Proof in Reconveyance Disputes

A Supreme Court ruling on reconveyance underscores that ownership claims must be proven by clear evidence, not mere allegations.