Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Sale vs Commodatum: Property Rights and Contractual Intent in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies how to distinguish sale from commodatum, and why proving ownership in recovery actions requires clear evidence of title and identity.
Rape Conviction Modified: When Qualifying Circumstances Must Be Alleged
The Supreme Court modifies a rape conviction, acquitting the accused on three counts for insufficient evidence and ruling on the necessity of alleging qualifying circumstances.
When Police Tips Fail: Hot Pursuit Arrests and Drug Evidence in Philippine Courts
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect, clarifying when warrantless hot pursuit arrests are invalid and seized drugs inadmissible.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused on Inconsistent Evidence
The Supreme Court acquits a murder accused on reasonable doubt, emphasizing that inconsistent prosecution evidence and corroborated defense testimony cannot sustain a conviction.
When Prosecution Evidence Fails: Acquittal in Drug Possession Case
Philippine Supreme Court acquits drug suspect where prosecution witnesses contradicted each other and failed to prove identity of seized marijuana.
Buy-Bust Operations and Evidence Admissibility: Safeguarding Rights in Drug Cases
Learn how Philippine courts treat buy-bust operations, evidence admissibility, and constitutional rights in drug cases, explained through a landmark Supreme Court ruling.
Protecting the Vulnerable: Rape Conviction Upheld for Child Victim
Supreme Court affirms death penalty for rape of a five-year-old, ruling the child's testimony and medical evidence proved consummated rape.
Electricity Pilferage: When Tampering With Utility Meters Is Proven and Who Bears Liability
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on electricity pilferage, tampering evidence, and liability of consumers for unregistered consumption in utility services.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails: The Imperative of Evidence in Criminal Convictions
The Supreme Court acquits Jesus Patriarca of murder, underscoring that circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Treachery and Witness Testimony in Murder Cases: Lessons from People v. Cubcubin
Supreme Court acquits murder accused where witness testimony was uncertain and illegally seized evidence was excluded. Learn the rules.
Bouncing Checks Law: The 90-Day Rule and Proof of Knowledge Under BP 22
Presenting a check after 90 days does not bar prosecution under BP 22—knowledge of insufficient funds can still be proven by other evidence.
Online Psychological Abuse and Social Media Evidence: The Supreme Court's Guidelines on Facebook Account Owner
How Philippine courts prove Facebook authorship in VAWC cases, and why using social media raises the penalty for psychological abuse.
Partnership Dissolution and Asset Determination When Accounting Records Are Unavailable
When partnership books are lost, courts can still determine a partner's share using secondary evidence. Learn the rules from this Philippine Supreme Court case.
When Eyewitness Testimony Overrides Forensic Evidence: Understanding Homicide Convictions in the Philippines
Philippine courts weigh eyewitness testimony against forensic evidence in homicide cases. Learn how credibility and inconsistencies shape convictions.
Eyewitness Testimony and Proving Robbery With Homicide: People v. Torres
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery with homicide conviction, explaining how eyewitness identification and circumstantial evidence establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Judicial Misconduct THE High Cost OF Impropriety IN Custody OF Evidence
Reasonable Doubt Prevails in Drug Possession Case: People v. Mariano
The Supreme Court acquits a drug possession accused where prosecution evidence fails to prove possession beyond reasonable doubt.
Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Sudden Attacks
How Philippine courts use circumstantial evidence to convict killers, even without direct proof of the shooting.
Rape Conviction Affirmed: Alibi Fails Against Positive Identification
Learn how the Supreme Court rejected alibi and upheld a rape conviction, explaining key rules on credibility, medical evidence, and damages.
Lack of Treachery Evidence Reduces Murder Charge to Homicide: People v. Crisanto
When prosecution fails to prove treachery, a murder conviction may be reduced to homicide. Learn the rules from People v. Crisanto.
Accountability for All: Conspiracy in Carnapping with Homicide
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on conspiracy in carnapping with homicide, explaining how circumstantial evidence can prove joint criminal liability.
Reasonable Doubt Acquittal Based on Insufficient Evidence of Conspiracy in Murder Case
Philippine Supreme Court ruling: mere presence at a crime scene does not prove conspiracy; accused acquitted on reasonable doubt.
Conspiracy and Murder by Hired Killers: When One Co-Accused's Acquittal Does Not Free Another
A look at how the Supreme Court upheld murder convictions based on conspiracy, positive identification, and circumstantial evidence in a hired killing.
Rape With Deadly Weapon: Victim's Testimony Stands Despite Lack of Physical Evidence
Supreme Court affirms rape conviction with scythe, holding victim's credible testimony sufficient despite absence of weapon or physical evidence.