From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 145–168 of 223 articles for “information”

Rape Conviction Hinges on Specificity: Charges Define the Crime

Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains why specific allegations in rape informations matter, and how penetration is proven in statutory rape cases.

Qualified Rape and the Burden of Proof: Lessons from People v. Baroy

The Supreme Court clarifies when the death penalty applies in qualified rape and why aggravating circumstances must be alleged in the information.

Rape With Deadly Weapon: Why Alleging Aggravating Circumstances Matters

The Supreme Court explains why aggravating circumstances must be alleged in the information before they can increase the penalty for rape.

Rape and a Defective Information: How the Court Protected the Accused's Rights

In People v. Desuyo, the Supreme Court reduced a death sentence to reclusion perpetua after the prosecution failed to prove the victim's age and filiation beyond reasonable doubt.

Rape and Defective Information: The Importance of Timely Objections and Evidentiary Standards in Qualified Rap

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on qualified rape, defective informations, timely objections, and evidentiary standards in child rape cases.

Rape and Defective Informations: Protecting the Rights of the Accused and the Victim

This article examines the Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Aquino on the sufficiency of rape informations and the rights of both the accused and the child victim.

Positive Identification Prevails Over Alibi in Robbery with Homicide Case

The Supreme Court explains when eyewitness identification outweighs alibi and why aggravating circumstances must be alleged in the information.

Rape Conviction Upheld but Death Penalty Cut Over Defective Information

The Supreme Court affirmed a stepfather's rape conviction but reduced the death penalty to reclusion perpetua because the information wrongly alleged a step relationship.

Credibility of Rape Victim's Testimony Alone Can Uphold Conviction

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on rape conviction based on victim's credible testimony, and why death penalty requires minority alleged in information.

Uncertain Testimony in Rape Cases: Safeguarding Justice and Due Process

The Supreme Court clarifies that an imprecise date in a rape information does not void it, but failure to allege the victim's age bars the death penalty.

Amendment of Information: Balancing Procedural Rules and the Accused's Right to Due Process

When can the prosecution amend an Information after the accused pleads? The Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between formal and substantial amendments.

Amendment of Information After Plea: Balancing Procedural Rules and the Accused's Rights

When may a court allow amendment of an Information after the accused pleads? The Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between formal and substantial amendments.

Parental Authority vs Incestuous Abuse: Why a Guilty Plea Did Not Ensure the Death Penalty

The Supreme Court affirms a father's rape conviction but reduces the death penalty to reclusion perpetua because the Information failed to state the victim's exact age.

Rape and Relationship: Clarifying Qualifying Circumstances for Imposing the Death Penalty

The Supreme Court clarifies that qualifying circumstances like relationship must be properly alleged in the Information for the death penalty to apply.

Rape and the Perils of Unpleaded Qualifying Circumstances: Protecting Due Process in Criminal Accusations

In People v. Laciste, the Supreme Court reduced a death sentence to reclusion perpetua because the victim's minority was not alleged in the information.

Credibility in Rape Cases: Supreme Court on Uncorroborated Testimony and Victim Behavior

SC explains why a rape victim's testimony can stand alone, and why the death penalty needed the relationship alleged in the information.

Parental Authority VS Statutory Rape Allegation OF Minority Must BE Explicit FOR Qualified Rape Conviction

SC rules minority must be alleged in information for qualified rape; Laciste convicted of simple rape, not death penalty.

Why Qualifying Circumstances Must Be Alleged in Rape Informations

The Supreme Court explains why failure to allege minority and use of a deadly weapon in a rape information downgrades the crime to simple rape.

Qualifying Circumstances in Rape: Why Specific Allegation in the Information Matters

The Supreme Court clarifies that qualifying circumstances like minority and use of a deadly weapon must be alleged in the information to justify the death penalty.

Upholding Victims Rights Positive Identification AND Aggravating Circumstances IN Rape Cases

The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction based on voice identification, but reduces the death penalty to reclusion perpetua because aggravating circumstances were not alleged in the information.

Rape Conviction Upheld: Voice Identification and the Requirement of Pleading Qualifying Circumstances

The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction based on voice identification but reduces the death penalty to reclusion perpetua because the information failed to allege qualifying circumstances.

Cameras in Court: The Estrada Trial and the Right to a Fair Hearing

Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling on live TV coverage of the Estrada trial, balancing public information against the accused's right to a fair trial.

When Rape Charges Are Not Qualified: The Importance of Specific Allegations in the Information

A Supreme Court ruling shows why qualifying circumstances in rape must be specifically alleged in the information to warrant the death penalty.

Rape Conviction Requires Precise Allegations Protecting Due Process in Criminal Charges

The Supreme Court ruled that convicting an accused of qualified rape when the information only alleged simple rape violates due process.