[ G. R. No. 37695. May 16, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37695. May 16, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37695
[ G. R. No. 37695. May 16, 1934 ]
ESTELA DE STILIANOPULOS, APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. ESTELA DE RAMOS ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND DEFENDANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirned with cost against the appellants.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________the sum of P__40.00___, as cost.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. 45647. December 20, 1937 ]
- [ Adm. Matter No. R-251-P. June 30, 1987 ](235 Phil. 284)
- G.R. No. 155408, February 13, 2008
- G.R. No. 132428, October 24, 2000
- [ G.R. No. L-33411. June 29, 1982 ](200 Phil. 168; 81 OG No. 3, 121 (January 2, 1985))
- G.R. No. 188029, September 02, 2020
- [ Caso Adm. No. 98. July 13, 1953 ]
- G.R. No. 211072, November 07, 2016
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.