[ G. R. No. 39165. July 17, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39165. July 17, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39165
[ G. R. No. 39165. July 17, 1934 ]
FLORENCIO VALDES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. MARIANO HERNANDO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Norte________, dated the __________6th__________ day of _________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts with costs of both instances against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees_________ from the __________the appellants _________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 223822, October 16, 2019
- [ A.M. NO. MTJ-05-1583 (FORMERLY OCA-IPI- NO. 04-1587-MTJ). March 11, 2005 ](493 Phil. 356)
- G.R. No. 102833, February 09, 1996
- [ G.R. No. 14590. May 25, 1960 ](G.R. No. 14590)
- [ G.R. NO. 147039. January 27, 2006 ](516 Phil. 110)
- [ G.R. No. L-5579. December 29, 1952 ]
- [ G.R. No. 133439. December 26, 2000 ](401 Phil. 906)
- G.R. No. 143289, November 11, 2004
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.