[ G. R. No. 40377. May 14, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40377. May 14, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40377
[ G. R. No. 40377. May 14, 1934 ]
MARGARITO OMILLA ET AL., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANTS VS. LUIS ONGAYO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Misamis Oriental________, dated the __________24th__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without costs.
It is further ordered that __________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from __________xx__________xx__________ the sum of P__xx__ , as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. P-02-1552. December 03, 2002 ](441 Phil. 526)
- [ G.R. No. 9480. November 13, 1914 ](G.R. No. 9480)
- [ G.R. No. L-1162. May 30, 1951 ]
- [ G.R. No. 5321. March 19, 1910 ](G.R. No. 5321)
- [ G.R. No. 221781. April 17, 2023 ](940 Phil. 405)
- [ G.R. No. 92504. May 18, 1993 ](294 Phil. 279)
- [ G.R. No. L-18598. July 23, 1968 ](133 Phil. 96)
- G.R. No. 155033, December 19, 2007
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.