[ G. R. No. 40062. August 16, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40062. August 16, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40062
[ G. R. No. 40062. August 16, 1934 ]
D. HAMANO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. DEMETRIA D. ESTRADA AND SALVADOR ESTRADA, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________31st________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila________, dated the __________9th__________ day of __________March_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ recover from __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 146099, April 30, 2003
- G.R. No. 129246, January 25, 2000
- G.R. No. 212971, November 29, 2022
- [ G.R. No. 137566. February 28, 2001 ](405 Phil. 638)
- [ G.R. No. L-25511. September 28, 1968 ](134 Phil. 338)
- [ G.R. No. L-17595. August 30, 1962 ]
- [ G.R. No. 89618. December 20, 1990 ](270 Phil. 609)
- [ G.R. Nos. 71044-45. March 16, 1987 ](232 Phil. 545; 85 OG No. 25, 3975 (June 19, 1989))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.