[ G. R. No. 38571. August 30, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38571. August 30, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38571
[ G. R. No. 38571. August 30, 1934 ]
MATIAS ALBALANTE, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. JUAN BACASIN ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________14th________day of ________August________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________14th__________ day of __________May_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________xx__________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ recover from __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 189145. December 04, 2013 ](722 Phil. 772)
- [ G.R. No. L-9131. July 31, 1959 ]
- [ G.R. No. 182239. March 16, 2011 ](661 Phil. 224)
- [ G.R. No. 35165. April 05, 1932 ](G.R. No. 35165)
- [ A.M. No. P-142. February 28, 1978 ](171 Phil. 539)
- G.R. No. 189590, April 23, 2018
- G.R. No. 132043, May 31, 2000
- [ G.R. No. L-47296. August 21, 1980 ](187 Phil. 645)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.