CTA Case No. 2528 (Decision)
". ' ' I.I P~ -1 8 ll~A~ Cl1Y a �� th �tl t ti n r . ... Vi� SIJ ... " � ,,j, .. c �5 0 � n� - ----------- / o I a.r/~ '0 ....... 0 0 V.:i. �, i c �Of .:. ec i 05 c. r: '\ ):' ":-� n d (.; u~ t: m� Cod i d' i n t 2 2l h~ � chl!" c ol . cLor JC �u 't .Jm!' . t' h..: ~ :t.'t. 0 r "n 'l� 1 fin Ot l , t00 ., \'.:10 �>n t l I t; .:J- r. �h es r d v, is i n in ' ' � .eci �e~n ? on� 11 ; t .A.,, n p 11 l 7� j, , f c \ i eci i n, ') tit Ma n -o �.� nc �� i it c ys nt e � -4/ ' ur rt'l. t b:t:o g h t e n t nt :.p . 1 . T - l(.": t ( c;:,ee r u n ~.,:,is � h ,; �H itt R '1~ t � y l-.' . 406, r - i th l~ ... � r �h .l 1� 71 . m n 0t , lo - t t :t l'} t wn t e in 0 t ..J ( 2) r m c ir n ��1J el t.i n. I, li~ ~n t in ,~�n i fe 0 t.' �t. n ) h 0 . ni 598
� ... � , 0� II u� �7 it �o � n 1r t - n 1 1 in e. n - 1 n t n �t ti .n � v l # 1' { � n v1 nc 1 '</ . � , ;: � nv i "' f 1. u .t .. 0i 0 i >r.. �t in 1- � u 0b r. ru t l/� Ir t., .�o .. � un ni 599
. ;, -. 52 .... ... i 0 tJ.. n .a . l . 0 ... �h f stom c� i 1 .. "" i ro (: ~� ion . i n rv c ser;, hr c n i ~ ., .i l b.r t h � t. 1 t;; i .h c1 Ofl.'l- ... tC i l ~::: t C )rnpl l bnr r; �f it n pt. c oy u u '"'if l".:U! tom� nn na man t r e 0 no m ;rtF~nt .. ( ) e c � c �� v � cyr � en c t )ilk , ~ l s N � 2203, J � c o ndr:!'l':f � I n <~: ,.. v a � c � cu m.s , o� i l � 1973 , � or :oilit 0 "C i ~t " V � .... s ! a ~ l t: i ... 11~ '" .o c r �o a �r' t'd n i !'o ... :1 rl �~n if ~ t; n �"'v n t' l1� s f n ,.,.., s; Lu . Co�.. ~ . i t 8 Pn nd i re� u r �ah..nt t "ld ~ ' '/ r t im� <: t. li fro r i n p t . l t ll l f' t ') V .tl t i~e ��t o{' ~ll t r t:i� r in tcn. ~a to l c. !JC.Cl c >) t 0 nt .. s t~ t: nt: .~ � 60 0
� - -. f i� it t lJ . h i � n n 1� � 1 1 � �0 � 601
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 943 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 943)
- DOHLE SHIPMANAGEMENT PHILS. CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and the ONE-STOP SHOP INTER-AGENCY TAX CREDIT AND DUTY DRAWBACK CENTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE(CTA Case No. 8721)
- GCOMM BUSINESS SUPPLIES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10696)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-76 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-76)
- PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. BATANGAS CITY, BENJAMIN E. PARGAS IN HIS CAPACITY AS CITY TREASURER AND TEODOLFO A. DUGUITO IN HIS CAPACITY AS LEGAL OFFICER OF BATANGAS CITY.(CTA Case No. AC-10)
- MAKATI CITY AND THE CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI CITY v. METRO PACIFIC RESOURCES, INC. (formerly: Cypress Harbour Properties, Inc.)(CTA Case No. EB 1814)
- LAZADA E-SERVICES PHILIPPINES, INC. v. CITY OF MAKATI, CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI(CTA Case No. AC-261)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. KONICA MINOLTA MARKETING SERVICES (PHILIPPINES), INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2974)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.