CTA Case No. 3916 (Decision)
-=-----~~ ~-~~ -~ ----wr--- P' � REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY - .:. PROVIDENT INSURANCE CORPORATION ~ Petitioner-, -��� ver-su s -� C.T.A. CASE NO. 3916 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , Respondent. x -- -�--- -- - ---- ~{ DEC I I 0 N This i s a claim for- ~ex cr-edit in the amount of P678~426.00 for- t h e taxable year-s 1983 and 1984 r-epr-esentinq / ':�:cess , ta:�: payments a nd cr-edita ble taxes withheld over- the amoun t due. Petitioner- i s a corpor-ation existing under- the J.i::\WS of t 1��? Philippines and that r-espondent Commi ss ioner of Internal Revenue is t he head of the Bur-eau of Internal Revenue. Petitioner is engaged in the bus iness of s e ll ing insur-ance and in investment of its funds in gover-nment bonds and other- sec ur-ities.
------~--~ -...- .. --~-~ DEC I f:3 I UN ..... CTA CASE NtJ. 3916 In 1983~ petitioner filed its final annual income t.a:-: retL.1r�n s howinq a t a :-: due of P69 ~ 744.00 and that i t �f il Ecc:l i t:.s quarter� J. y income taH r-eturn as r-equin: d by the l'.lat..ional Inter�� nal Revenue Code and paid the following amounts: . . . . . . . . . 1 s t f:ltr. P27B~004.74 . . . . . . . . . 2 nd C:lt.r. ~334 ~ 547. 16 ~Jrd Qtr. . . .. . . . . . 17,4 :~:B.65 Thf.�?r:~ e amounts include ?q46vS5 taxes ;- cr-editable wit:hhf.�?ld on inter-est �for gover-nment bonds of P49,~? 75.00~ total r-efundable sum of P609, 5 :::'0. 00. In 1984~ considering that i t lo s t during that ther� e v1e1'�� p alleq�~ d cr-editable ta:-:es withheld on interest from government bonds of or an a lleged total r�efund a b l e amount of F'68~906 . .1.0. Summing up tht.�~ i::\lleqed creditable amounts of P609~520.00 and P68~906.10~ i t arrived at the total refundable sum of P678,426.00. On apr�il 2, .1985, petitioner- , thru counsel, A t t y . Demosthenes B. Gadioma, c: 1 aimed �for t h e ta}: 57
DEC IS I Dl\1 CTA CASE ND . 3 916 3 cr-e d i t of the a l l e g e d amount of F'6 7 8~4 2 6.00 (E:-:h. J~ pp. 7 1 - 7 3 , CTA r ec .) a s follow s : Ta:-: clue pe r- I"ll~ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � P 6 <7, 7 44. 00 T.:\:-: payments : l s t. qua r-t e r- ITR F?78,00 4 :;:nd II II 3::r4' 54 7 ~~ r��d II II .1 7 ' 4~.!8 Cn"'(:H t a ble t.a:-:es wi th-��� tE lc:l on i nte l'"�e s t . fr-c:li'TI t goven1mE~n bends --�������6�����7����9�����'--2-���6�����4����.��(���X�����)� Ta~�! dt.te -- l oss y ear- ... . . " �..� �. �� Cn ;�dita bl e t a:-a:-.>s withhe ld on i nt.e n .:=st. fn.Jin qclVf?r�nrnf.:~nt b:::lr�lds . � P 5:3 , 8 f:l2. ~5:3 and fr-un r-ental s earnt."'d � � � � � � � � J.~',!.~~~:;:;; .~-~i� - _. Ano...u��lt r�e �fund a ble .. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � P 68, 906 . .1. 0 Tot.:~ l a mc:unt. n.~ 1' und a bl e �few .t9fJ3 8.( 1.984 ���� ��� � ������� F' 6 7 8 4 2 6 . 0 0 ~::o:::::o:::::::::::,:::::::::::::::::::::::::�:::: R es pond r:~ n t Cornmi ss .ion e r of In t e rn a 1 R eve nu e , howeve r, did not act on sa id cl a im for tax c redit. The only i s su e in thi s case i s whe ther or nbt. peti tiom?r Pr-ovident In s urance Cor- poration i s entitl e d ,to the cr e dit of the alleg e d amount of F'678,42 6.00.
DEC I f3 I UN CTA CA SE NCJ. 3 916 - 4 -� F' e t.i.t.icm e r- i s E:;> ntit.J. e d to th e claim fo r ta >: credit. s o muc h a s it has proved to hav e been er-roneous ly p a id by virtue of its e v id e nce. The pet i tioner h as s hown b y its evi dence that i t i s entitled to c laim f o r ta >: c redit. �for the yea rs 1983 a nd 1984 only the amount of tax withheld at s m ..w ce in th E:> s um of F'640,930. ~!. 0~ comput e d as foll o ws : Ta:-: due r::er- I TF: � � . � � � . � � � . . � � � . � � � � � � � P 69 ~ 744.00 1s t Di:r-- . (b:hs. C3 II.( B) ��� F~.:~7B~00:3 . 74 . ...97..9 , :',1:~:!. Q9 :.:.:'nd Dt.r- . (E>: hs. H~ H- .1 /1.( B-���1) � � � � � � � � � � 3".::4 ~ 54'7 . .16 3 r�d Cl t.r-. ( E:-:hs . I -���.1 II.( A) � � � .t7 ~ 4:~.8. 65 Cn?<:Ht:a bl e t.a:-:es vlit.hhE;> ld on inte r-es t �fr-�cxn gover�n -- mE�nt tx~�d s ( b: hs . c ~ C-�� .1 to C--4) � � � � � � � � � � � � � .......4? , ~~?.!? ._o:)o::l Tota l r e funda bl e arrn..tnt. fot~ .1.9E1.3 Ta:-: L)..tf.?-��� 1 CJ<::",s y e ,::\r-� ��� � ���������� �� �� � �� Zero Cn :x:h. tabl e tm:es vJ.i. thi-Je ld c:n inte t'"�est �fr-c.(n CJDVer-nnlent tx::nd ~; : (E:-:h. . ' �� � � � �� � ����� P 6, 7~).00 (E:-: h. E -1 ) � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17 ~ 2 12 . ::�.o (E:-: h. F) � � . . . . . . . � � . � l.,OZ~. 2 5 (E:-:h. F-���1) ��� ����� ����� 1~057.:50 (E:-:h. F--2 ) � � � � � � � � � � � � � Z -75.0::14 (E:-:h. F--:.:q � � � � � � � � � � � � � .t ,046.00 ( E:{ h. F -�-4) � � � � � � � � � � � � � 965.1.6 (E:-:h. F ��-5) � � � � � � � � � � � � � ... .. :~ ,~:'b.,t.o::1~ f.: . ::;:1,4.~Q~ :~;'Q Total l'"l?"fLtndable amcJI..tnt for� 1984 . . � . . � � ~: :::,:~1,,,;'f},,S\~,,i.5~
DECIBION �� eTA cr.,m:: t < � 3916 - 5- Tota 1 n :��fundab 1e f or 198.3 ��.�����.����� F'609' 5::~0. 00 Tot.c::\l n :�fundable �for.. J 984 �.������.� � ��� ::::.1 41o. :~o Gr�and total refundable for� """"" '"""' ' " "" " " ". " " """' 1.9B::; and 1.984 � � � � � . . � . . � . � � � . � ����. Note that the amounts of P6~ 7 50.00 (Exh. E- 3) and P1.7~21 2 .50 (Exh. E- 2 ) were remo v ed in the computation of the c:\ moun t. they apparently constitute a reproduction only of Exhs . E and E -- .1. l�JHEF<EFORE , Commi ss .i.oner� Inter-r1 a l.R r.:> v e nu e .i. s hereby o r d f:? r e d t u qrant. a ta :�: to p�:- t.i. t:..i.nn E~ l'" Pr�ovident Cor� por� r.~t .i. on th e qr. a nd t o t a l sum o �f F'640~9 3 0. 3 0 as excess tax payments for the years 1983 and 1984. Without pronouncement. .a s to co s ts. SO ORDERED. Que z on City, Metro Manila, Auqus t 1988 � ...__ . ROAQUIN ,Judge
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3916 �- 6 -�- hiE CONCUR: AMANTE Presiding ,Judge -~ Associate Judge CERT I F I C AT I 0 N I certi-fy that this decision was reached a-fter due consultation amo~g the me mbers o-f the Cour�� t Appeals in accordance with Section 1 3 ~ Article VI II o-f the 0~n s titution. ~~/ AMANTE ILLER F'resid i g ,Jtldge Court o-f Tax Appeals
More in CTA Decisions
- SONOMA SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7613)
- PHILAM SAVINGS BANK, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7241)
- CTA Case No. 5664 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5664)
- HEDCOR SIBULAN INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9080)
- HAZAMA PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 232)
- CTA Case No. 4140 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4140)
- PROCTER & GAMBLE INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS SA-ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2740)
- CTA Case No. 326 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 326)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.