CTA Case No. 302 (Decision)
/, � - v SUI .. E� �� 2 � r�naal \~~ eve ue , X� � --. - --I-P -d-n-t-. ~-~' II -�- --- t���� a � an exe tl n fr the paym nt nectl n ith said nufacture a a n n n y t stry. Plyw d is u ac u.r ��t� , ~ . 7 or or� a ven er , '169
�2 thin s ts of l or. Our ng t per od fr nuary 1 fr h � f rest c ne�ssion 11,147.9 eub.c m ters of logs n h ch th c r sp nd!n for t eh rg in the t al nt of 8,1 3.52 s d. � etitioner used th d 1 9 �n the n f ctur of pl d nd v nc r xcept th portion 1h ch he exp rt t J P n, un r xp t ntr 6 4. d t J nu ry 5, 195 � 61, � 19w4� nd 6977, d d reh .,)1 , 19 , 1 1n 1,168 cu� � � 1,7 cu. � and 1, 1 �� re p cti 1 � ce th r of th ur u f or try f il to ny nt n:n.�mo t c ar s log x or d th nuf ctur of plvJW.,r\1 ur n tl p r o fr to Au u t nd nt, i c.: 1 tt r t d D c 19, 19 5, a a &t an an ed fr p t - f 8 , 1C3....2 nd th o nt o 2, 25. 8 s ' r e. .. - ion r or th r eon 1 er t1on o t 1n n n1 d in 1 th 1n5tant e o nt does n 1 ot ' ' of nu ctur ver , res nd nt alle on s id lo are not directly pay le y p titi er in ai anuiac � ri s a a ew a - 470
� 302 - 3- a~y ustry under epublic c � 1. on the heory hat they are ehargea n th prlvile e 9r1ntea y the g vern nt for t e xpl 1tatlon of f rest c cetsi �� n the ther en � 1lt � tit! ner � tts hla lia 111 y for the for st c and eurcha ge e t l e orted u der xport Entr1ea s. 1 nd 77 (p. ' etttl er) , ev ti � t xabUtty o th loga c: v r n the r t.ha aai &, ha ing n l. ly c 1 0. �� ru ry 3 , 1 � ul not ve n xport � in & e n lv 1n hi or not th f r &t ch r e c 1 hin t � the t x � e pt on rante to tition r. Th r lutl n f thi fir turn p e t !.t' rx f ubl"c ct o. 1, t rtln nt p rt f � it! r contends that f rest e ar r tax� it in t � purvi w t t x ex pt vi d in epubl c c � l t ch n- t itled, 1areas respond nt inta ns t he c ntr ry vie � 471 Lft3
�2 - 4- I cr��t ar r D s e nf d by ect on 18 � xC ;J. ic provi I 8 foll s: 1r .., . A 1""1 ') Lj ' , ..,
ct+ � " . 473
D� I�SI�Oc - o. 302 � 6- ' 1.955 u- for 11 0 tl � ��
o. 2 - 7- rs t tl � 7. f cl rgea th 1 t nder xpr 0 61 d 977, t h c t t � � r 2, 1 1. la, l!pp I 47 5
T I II 1' �:.s ()I� 1 \PPl:.AU MA:-.olU � c0 et t1on r , - vr c.r . . c s o. 302 espo nt. c .Li u I ocr 1 o inio or the jor1ty that t1t1o r 1 l bl o t or cr r 1 1 or t e o t to tI iss nt rro ri y o 1n1o hold n x t ~r or t c r o lo b1 1n nut eture � 0$ rt d t ' [1 t t t 1t1on r bil t cr v r, 1 it is ni o lo ort u :1 r ort try o. t ry 5', 1951+, ol 17 o t h round t t t ere � � � h- ther the lo cov red y ort o. 65 1 cover b,1 t lett r or !bit '1'. ( 7, titionor, reb 26, 195'7.) a tted liability tor the t or t 0 t c r on lo& ported 0 t ntry o. 65 ' petitioner y re11 ve lt from liability only 6 Ll- t'"I'1
477
302 - 3- u nd r o g or ~t pr ~uc ts ~ t he p blic forests and tr c ri~ te lands . y ~t on t e footing as ng 1 o ed d.er 1itl VII t e e. ' Un1 d St t i- for st cl r ~.;;.. nd 1n1n n t d s r uct!cn d t e or ~t e r s r 11 t1 o r ex pt fro t ch e r e on tt orest cone of ood. nt tion 901 . r 7- etlon 1 or t or 11 s in t to t or 0 ptio wi t ct to 1o of t eo e s ion. Operation ot or t io , by 0 ct Tirtlle or 1ch t co ca 1o 1r i d r ove or t od cts nd to a 11 , ls ate d1ati ct si s rr t ot nutaet � 1o r ela1a tio nt of ore t c oaase the ar ot xes dtr etly ble 1 1 �>).
- - a - C. T. � � 3 :? - 4- r ~ cct t th ope t1on of tha ex t 1 du~ ry - cur of nl � ( Coll ctor or Int . n v. v. l e t eel orp . , G. �� o . L- 248 , Oc � 1 , " 1956. ) ttc io or th t one io by tit oncr 1 b i.liness 1io� 1 c r tb -...... 0 'Y t t ct 1 ort d l.o c t r ~ ~ fore~ t ion. t .,... t l r 1 tc t1 c it �.... " �e 0 t r nt 0 i r u 0 .... c to r le tter ....... t0 ' 0 fl :f'ro � 47 9
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 4308 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4308)
- REMA TIP TOP PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2688)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILEX MINING CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1457)
- CBK POWER COMPANY LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with Case No. 7814)(CTA Case No. 7771)
- TUTUBAN PROPERTIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7634)
- CTA Case No. 629 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 629)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TEAM (PHILIPPINES) OPERATIONS CORPORATION [formerly: MIRANT (PHILIPPINES) OPERATIONS CORPORATION (formerly: Southern Energy Asia-Pacific operations (Phils.), Inc.](CTA Case No. EB 369)
- INTEL PHILIPPINES MANUFACTURING, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 209)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.