CTA Case No. 3749 (Resolution)
.VP\JBLIC 0 F t't-fF P~tUPPtN.i'� r �. _. ~ou T ~.- �.�-.f'~Ul...~ QUJ::%01'1 C 1""' ion r, - vecs � � C . t . A. CASE � 3749 TH � co AL x--- -------x SOLUTIO lt appe r1DQ th t p 1 1 r 1� no long r - �� his ,.. r 1nt.ereat i � 1 1� 1 1nd1e 1 he " ot Cl Case a- '� n � file 0 J D ry 19 7 th that erein th ta 11ab1 1t1ea a uQht to be coll t. h lre y n 1 y of e r au n cu ive " r � 4 hpe itio r pay- 1 9 t. co pro 1 e a. un f �� � 383.00 v1 � Cen r 1 nk on!i e tion R � 7 7 74 t r �l � in j io rt c r a th � 1d 10 1 her by De 1t1o for revi wbe or in ly, le he de ir th it � cas c nai- red c rntin t � Ci y, e r 1 � Jan a y 20, 19 7. 1
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 3982 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3982)
- LEVEL UP, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9424)
- CTA Case No. 1061 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1061)
- LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8889)
- BASES CONVERSION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8757)
- Mirant Navotas Corporation v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7437)
- CTA Case No. 1807 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1807)
- CTA Case No. 3516 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3516)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.