CTA Case No. 3495 (Resolution)
�J'lll'lJWLrC 0' "'f! f'IU'l.l\"rJ,..,... .:OuRT OF TAX .~f�I'tAU flW!J.ul'l 01'?' NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO . , LTD. (MANILA C.T.A. CASE NO. 3495 BRANCH), C. T.A. CASE NO. 3768 Petitioner, - versus - THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Petitioner, - versus- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X R E S 0 L UT I 0 N It appearing that petitioner in the above-entitled cases is no longer interested in pursuing its appeals to this Court as in die ated in the "Motion To Withdraw Petition For Review" filed on May 18, 1988 on the ground that the claims for refund or tax credits involved herein have already been approved with the issuance of Tax Credit Memo No. 5349 dated May 4, 1988 covering the aggregate amount of 17518,495.33 in favor of petitioner, and with the conformity of counsel for respondent, the said motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, let the petitions for review be deemed withdrawn and the above-entitled cases considered closed and term in ate d. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Metro Manila, May 25, 1988. ~z.~ ~~~ Associate Judge AMANTE FI ER Presiding Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 2946 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2946)
- TRAVEL WAREHOUSE INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9103)
- THE MUNICIPALITY OF VILLANUEVA, MISAMIS ORIENTAL represented by its MUNICIPAL MAYOR and MUNICIPAL TREASURER v. FDC MISAMIS POWER CORPORATION and PHIVIDEC INDUSTRIAL AUTHORITY(CTA Case No. AC-266)
- CTA Case No. 382 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 382)
- CTA Case No. 4849 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4849)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MINDANAO I GEOTHERMAL PARTNERSHIP(CTA Case No. EB 953)
- VIRICSON CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, REVENUE REGION NO. 8 - MAKATI CITY; BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, REVENUE DISTRICT OFFICE NO. 52, PARA?AQUE(CTA Case No. 8709)
- CTA Case No. 3280 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3280)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.