[ G. R. No. 39268. June 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39268. June 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39268
[ G. R. No. 39268. June 08, 1934 ]
ENRIQUE ABELLANOSA ET AL., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEES, VS. MARCELINA ABELLANOSA ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________23rd________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Misamis Oriental__________, dated the__________9th______________ day of __________November_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with the costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellants __________the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 45701. April 18, 1939 ](G.R. No. 45701)
- G.R. No. 168561, September 26, 2008
- [ G.R. No. 237506. July 28, 2020 ](878 Phil. 425)
- [ G.R. No. L-24874. September 30, 1978 ](174 Phil. 557; 75 OG 2990 (April, 1979))
- G.R. No. 193314, June 25, 2013
- G.R. Nos. 134844-45, January 17, 2001
- [ G.R. Nos. 135180-81 & 135425-26. August 16, 2000 ](392 Phil. 827)
- [ G.R. No. L-24287. January 24, 1968 ](130 Phil. 176)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.