CTA Case No. 1689 (Decision)
REPURLIC OF THE PHILIPPl~ES <_;r,URT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON Ctl'Y ..... ; 9 .. <:' t< l - .. .. 1n t.~ an ?P l r m is on t 0 c ... C~" t ' r; '- ..o l95" , t 195'~~ t" '1 ?'J 1r ,$ ly b.t to t ~ ... ~ t 95 5i .. t1o ... 5-' .f! t s 33 d . ' -r;'r 2- ~ 1 ;r,? 3� , '> ne . t. ~') 155
.,... 95;;, t. 1 1 ~. l. f3' n f)~ ' 1 %. t 0 '1 �"' .:,! , .t t on t n t , r. �.t''lon 1 tt�tien;;) c t ncco ... fo ... .t (l) 1 .� 0.- .. ' () 7 156
/ ~c- - J fHl., ~:r t0 157
... -' t 1 158
t 1):lpon~a � ~ ;tn a lC'vt~,.d t 1:3 ttaC'it.l ; .;9nttt f t~ �~ ol 1."'*.,41! b \l:"t1t1�41:r> as ,l~ �.J.etton J.roo It~&,.<� s i � eo."' . ��ol' 1956 on ~..h1! grou.n s t ....t f' ;.~1 ~ to prQ 0:~ in�try n�~ dtie,. n.s~~}'i ~.-� th~t,~ 59V~~i\..~s h.ld b�� ~ a~ P~tti~ by ~ectton 30( �J(1 ) or t . tl.l.\s t !r.;o 1a:1.. c., a$',. !at .r.1 or h �~t~~ & eo ~ , tt1b1t~ p~t1tton~r th wrJS o. ,~, ~oo. e , <,.. lQ;reh 1 ,. 1,.,; :!'~rio( :S'a, sc"c., m'l f1 ~i;pt..!tr�"'Jt" l9 :t 195~ for tho rf.$�,;;;1 ~'~~"*t'tt.$ ' f1,.le:~i> p 1 ~ tr.ty l ,, 1 J5 !~ 'tJo r-�::H':::~":v'~ 31, 195~~ in G .~tu'!~� t.tcn 'lllth lt~ tnv zttlG te: riv O�!lZ ~o ?:t1tiot~~..i-:'S th�at lJt>tit-iofl~n�
9 n 0 tili 1 "' 't Ot'' ... '1 . tr d pp 1e � t x- 1� t - tty. u { � t ,. 160
\/ Jo ;: 1 tl J � f ... t n:; ~~. �� - �;. 0 0 1 t) . te .t t n .... P nc �'.0~ ... s ol~ t t n t' 161
~CIS . t ..., .. ~ c . /~ 1: 1t t ~- I .t h ! t tJ:nan~ .... it... ; �f t ~ t pr 1 � t. 162
t � � � ). Moreover, � �t . ). t. t t t t i� 16 3
-..., t:o, 1 39 . 10 (1) t 0' 2, t P� ti 1 Q 1Ptn. s~J tD.Xl an..1 �t� to" bl tt tp (2) cm:nnts of .. '1 .� t ~l Y t P~ t o 1 ... 0 t 'l~ 1.! t~ t _t n n t. ncl lb � 1o. t.s etiou 25; :I t - ' 164
l 01~ � .tey dtVi�� t" '( ,., 2 et o � ' t" pl � i 165
1 s Gp - �� t . o : :� 166
� 3 167
I .. 19 n -1 . :p~-1 th� di - !' 168
l"� 15 nc . o.J.' t t e� ~ ,<I' . ,or , tl-J n bi;:� '.t eo-.t e !' ... i. t; nti that it ' � tr:tat t iQ; ltP b ... � t0 0 ...
tl oth . . ( -,'"' -. 170
? ( � t lt is urged .. \! 171
t 1 1' t �� t � ' i> 17 2
... ' t ... 173
t- ti' t 1 l'\ti 0� t>lit .. 1, J:t ol' ..t. 0 Ln � t., p � �1d s � 174
..,. 175
� - ' 6 1 t-1
.. � � ese, gets a v �' . ' �� I .1' � v. th urf t -. n !'b .rul � ,.; :"1 e 11 n I f () Bt �t:tt 3 ~ .. t t!t ~ r 0 � ,, oes so he t. is ' .t j~ ;1"�7"7
1 tr t1 t j, ,. t n ./ " 0 nt rJ. c~ 0 . r ~~ 17'8
.. .. � nt � ..... c J ,. o- iJ ' r � i' 17 9
� - � , / 1 "� '. '- t -~ O!'dr h 180
~~ 181
~ �8 r st 0 a0 by n ' c::o... � � It ' ,, 182
More in CTA Decisions
- MILLENNIUM BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7441)
- MALINGAS MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BUREAU OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 9150)
- PROVIDENT TREE FARMS, INC. represented herein by TEODORO G. BERNARDINO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10459)
- China Banking Corporation v. The Treasurer of the City of Manila(CTA Case No. EB 525)
- ZUELLIG PHARMA CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8801)
- CTA Case No. 3510 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3510)
- ALTIMAX BROADCASTING CO., INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8828)
- FOUR SEAS TRADING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9915)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.