[ G.R. No. L-1044. April 26, 1947 ]
[ G.R. No. L-1044. April 26, 1947 ]
G.R. No. L-1044
[ G.R. No. L-1044. April 26, 1947 ]
CECILIA V. MENDOZA, ON BEHALF OF HER BROTHER-IN-LAW, PRISONER SOSTENES MENDOZA, PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, RESPONDENT.
D E C I S I O N
CECILIA V. MENDOZA, ON BEHALF OF HER BROTHER-IN-LAW, PRISONER SOSTENES MENDOZA, PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, RESPONDENT.
CRIMINAL LAW; PARDON; UNDERSTANDING HAD WITH IMPERIAL JAPANESE FORCES AS TO PARDON, NOT PROVEN.—The allegation that there was an understanding with the Imperial Forces that the convict would be granted pardon after six months work in the military installation in Davao was not proven. A computation of his service of the penalty shows that it has not yet expired. So, petition for habeas corpus is denied.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 241394 (Formerly UDK No. 16255). December 09, 2020 ](892 Phil. 336)
- [ G.R. No. 176706. October 08, 2008 ](589 Phil. 226)
- A.C. No. 5718, December 04, 2003
- [ G.R. No. L-30523. April 22, 1977 ](167 Phil. 164)
- [ G.R. No. 123248. October 16, 1997 ](345 Phil. 1133)
- [ G.R. No. 235956. December 05, 2018 ](844 Phil. 1043)
- [ G.R. No. 138959. January 16, 2001 ](402 Phil. 343)
- [ G. R. No. L-9490. November 29, 1957 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.