[ G. R. No. 39065. June 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39065. June 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39065
[ G. R. No. 39065. June 09, 1934 ]
SALVADOR B. BILLO, ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLEES, VS. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, OPPOSITOR AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________17th__________ day of _________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, without special pronouncement as to costs.
It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P_ xx __, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 163609, November 27, 2008
- A.M. No. P-03-1758 (Formerly AM No. OCA IPI 03-1553-P), December 10, 2003
- G.R. No. 114185, January 30, 1997
- G.R. No. 121658, March 27, 1998
- G.R. No. 159390, June 10, 2004
- G.R. No. 123146, June 17, 2003
- [ G.R. No. 195307. August 06, 2012 ](692 Phil. 373)
- [ G. R. No. L-19967. May 31, 1965 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.