CTA Case No. 1881 (Decision)
REPCRf.TC OF THE PHILTPP1.~E8 ('1 \l, U I (lF TA.X APPBAL8, QUEZON CITY � - e,: � � 1 CO .I'SIO - -,. CI I ,..,. al y et ti I ~-r-I sl a L G vic � f (. d 11n 1 1' 1t' n � ti s, 1 a s 1Q5,- 60 1 6 -1 l p f ,. e 0 t 1 1 ais nd r ut. h r -t d r t �.. 107 I
I ' �l l - 10 8
�1 l - 3- 109
�1 l -- . .. .� � � 6 � � � � .�. p � � � � �� � � � � t ���� �� � �� � � � � �� � �� � � ����� � � � � �� � � � � � ve a d1 1- it, rt � t a 1- t, l) t l 3 1 ; th � c � 110
'I 1 111
�1 1 - ... 6 � � � w t 11 � �� t r � �t tt � l t l ,. Tb 11 � t .. is, 1 t ti t ale l" t t e 1 at h { t 1t 1 ,. 9�35 112
o. lJ 81 - 7- �� 1 -� � �� ����� �� � 3, 7 � It- 3 110. 2 � 1l �I)
.1 ... ?1 .68. i '1 I}
- "1 - ... 30 I v f s1 t � i ~ 11 st 0 t t. i ) s ., ( . 9- ? I t 11 f t1 ' � h .... i I .., t 115
�1 1 -- p � 1 lls r it �I �rt - tb 1t t i� h& 1 t rt1 1 st 1 th1 e)? I t t v t - t � r1 1 ~t tt s t v fact � t his ( h 1" ,,~
-I l1 - - 1 ... �l I ) t b t tale t r 1t �I 11 ta.... l t � it e t t1 ' the e t_ ts e )t r 9 1 t1 1- 1 e r1 t ei t Ji ~r r u ts a - su eet t 3 !! It 1 ell- et 1 1 Wt r ft' r -e it r vi e r that .�fl' st v s ( e ~11all b t ed t~ th e as r is rti 1 � I 1 l 1 1 :tv 1 t 1 t 11 i tb rt 1. 1$1 t1v bo y uld v 0 n~ th ' !> r se �e oe t r -t r s f. r 1 ut:tl t hioh 1 tr tiel ., � 1 c1 t hr 1 t 1 t1 t 0 r.ml �( l l1 il ., ln � v... . Gi- ,,"(
�l A - 1 ... 1 18
'; � l 1. -13- .~ lt t i� t er � al is- th t1w 111 ,. v a 1'1 o:r the � i s i a 1 ep 11 � 1612, 1 t t r1 l 1; ~6 de s elli r at tiole� rat t1o t i th1 t tat i the t ao.c �� � ' 1 11 � 1612 dl s � � 1 ct .........,........ 1 s hi e tiale , are � t :). 6 ot1 s� thi 1 gisl t1v )I") 1 .1 9
': o. l 81 - 14 - e 1 ly, etiti er h l b all w t duct the t t 1 eo t f t� rt a e r1 ni s ti 1 te rt r 1t � f " t eir . s llin ri e . art r t :xe � t 30 ec s er s ti l s � Th d1 all t th r r th t ,. a t � t ac � hi a ie1e 7 les t X ~e t r1 1960-1961 1 t t f 11, 29 .o ., 3, 654. 01, �respecti v l. � a ai t peti- ti r I ter I 1 d Ga rv1 I ., ca t t s ., t t r fi i t a y r te t t 1 . t he r 11 v- al s t in thi c 1 fi l y ar. 1 1 . Oct b r 1 1 1959 t er Ot 196 � . 2. Oct er 1, 1960 t t ber o, l 61. It s 1 0 t b r 6 1 1966 d r 1'fe by 0 t r2 c., � 128 p . 30 ) . de the pr _vi io r th 3(A) th litral v � tb tu tg tX r br th the t . d t r n ai . Jl f ch 0 t � ,.A> 120
c �1 1 .. 1 .. 121
� -l - t � ti 1t � I l t � t t' ( rf ) 1 1c 1 1) ai o al � � ,. r "'+ 1 77. I ,v
More in CTA Decisions
- SL HARBOR BULK TERMINAL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10320)
- PHILIPPINE CHARITY SWEEPSTAKES OFFICE v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, LARGE TAXPAYERS SERVICE, in their official capacities as officers of the Bureau of Internal Revenue.(CTA Case No. 8036)
- CE CEBU GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 741)
- BUKIDNON SECOND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (BUSECO) V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2553)
- ORDOPRIME VENTURES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10042)
- AMMEX I-SUPPORT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11192)
- CTA Case No. 681 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 681)
- CTA Case No. 779 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 779)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.