[ G. R. No. 40549. August 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40549. August 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40549
[ G. R. No. 40549. August 07, 1934 ]
MAXIMO JALANDONI, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MARIANO B. ARROYO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Iloilo________, dated the _________21st__________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of this instance against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appellee_________ recover from __________the defendant-appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 47186. December 12, 1940 ](G.R. No. 47186)
- [ G.R. No. 221706. March 13, 2018 ](827 Phil. 818; 114 OG No. 50, 8373 (December 10, 2018))
- G.R. NO. 166865, March 02, 2007
- [ G.R. NO. 146586. January 26, 2005 ](490 Phil. 193)
- [ G.R. No. 20262. May 11, 1967 ](G.R. No. 20262)
- [ G.R. Nos. 244413 & 244415-16. February 18, 2020 ](871 Phil. 86)
- [ G.R. No. L-49536. March 30, 1988 ](242 Phil. 869)
- [ G.R. No. 5673. March 21, 1910 ](G.R. No. 5673)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.