[ G. R. No. 38951. June 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38951. June 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38951
[ G. R. No. 38951. June 09, 1934 ]
DOLORES PASCUAL CASAL Y OCHOA, ETC., APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. MANUEL QUIOGUE, MOVANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________4th__________ day of _________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without special pronouncement as to the costs.
It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 265769, August 12, 2025
- [ G.R. NO. 131547. December 15, 2005 ](514 Phil. 222)
- G.R. No. 164710, September 28, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 42290. February 16, 1935 ](G.R. No. 42290)
- [ G.R. No. 273832. November 18, 2025 ](G.R. No. 273832)
- [ G.R. No. 226792. June 06, 2017 ](810 Phil. 470)
- G.R. NO. 160719, January 23, 2006
- [ G.R. No. 28239. November 10, 1967 ](G.R. No. 28239)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.