[ G. R. No. 37110. June 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37110. June 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37110
[ G. R. No. 37110. June 09, 1934 ]
CATALINO MALLARI, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. RURAL DE ABAYAT, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pampanga________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of _________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellees_________from the _________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. Nos. 128346-48. August 14, 2000 ](392 Phil. 459)
- [ A.C. NO. 5835. April 15, 2005 ](496 Phil. 1)
- [ A.M. No. P-07-2410. June 18, 2010 ]
- G.R. No. 95694, October 09, 1997
- G.R. No. 118334, February 20, 2001
- G.R. No. 153653, October 02, 2009
- [ G.R. No. 126126. October 30, 2000 ](398 Phil. 346)
- [ G.R. No. 65656. February 28, 1985 ](219 Phil. 783; 85 OG No. 42, 6426 (October 16, 1989))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.