CTA Case No. 3737 (Resolution)
.,~\JBLIC OP fH� PtULlPPINf'� ~OURT OF TAX AP.P�ALI QU.ECOI'l C~"!'Y PRECl &ION F!Lt!C':ti".>Nlc.... C ;' i �ut. 1 tJ, - v raua - THE CO'tff-4lSS l0NJ:;R OF I .T&:.~�~.R~.u R�espondent. X- � � � - - - � - � - X S 0LU I 0 ACtin on the motion filed: by petiti ner on J n ry 1�, 19 7 in the ebov -entitl d case for the ithdrawal of the petition or review o the rou that the aame ha alrea y en th subject a co, r ia settle nt twe n the partiea, and there objec to the par of res- pon nt.1 b cour re olve , as prayed for, to gr n L t t 1 tition for vi con idered wi h- dre n h ' c dee 4 clo� d � r~inat ::,Q k. ER 0 � Q Q C1 y, Metro anile, January 19, 1987. ~~ Pr:es.t.di.ng Ju 1z�~
More in CTA Resolutions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SECURITIES TRANSFER, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2057)
- CTA Case No. 5443 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 5443)
- EUROVERSAL PROPERTIES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9869)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JIMMY KHO(CTA Case No. EB 2877)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2657)
- CARMEN COPPER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9659)
- SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9504)
- CTA Case No. 3402 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3402)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.