[ G. R. No. 36382. May 05, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 36382. May 05, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 36382
[ G. R. No. 36382. May 05, 1934 ]
APOLINARIO TICHANGCO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. VICENTA VICTORIA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Nueva Ecija________, dated the __________2nd__________ day of __________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ____________the appellee____________ recover from the ____________the appellants_____________the sum P__40.00________, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. L-10964. February 27, 1959 ]
- [ A.M. No. P-292. November 25, 1982 ](204 Phil. 279; 80 OG No. 42, 5465 (October 15, 1984))
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-06-1971 (Formerly OCA IPI No.03-1775-RTJ). October 17, 2007 ](562 Phil. 355)
- G.R. No.199008, November 19, 2014
- [ G.R. No. L-17919. July 30, 1966 ]
- [ G.R. No. 105006. September 04, 1996 ](330 Phil. 79)
- G.R. No. 143047, July 14, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 120426. November 23, 1995 ](320 Phil. 363; 92 OG No. 27, 4128 (July 1, 1996))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.