CTA Case No. 2405 (Decision)
R ~i. C OF' TH~ II .IPPJ~J-.:8 r:.t�f Tt 1' AX APPE. Lt! l.r "'t)N CITY 1 U.s f ��� ' � 2 ' ... ,'V~ ~~ y t;U ll> - ... ... .. .. - - - - - . - - - ..~. 'r t u r "l � 251
DtCihl ~ ... C 1 " 1,., A:3 J. ,~t, � ~~ )' Pet!t1on r ..:ile 'Hi G :..b il "�c. ill t..f Cus ous vh �ri the ,. 1 ~1n � . omlds , J �� Til.�. ta~t i.bat �tbe ~ u.rea ... o aid t im ~t s rras re chart~ a � aa go a L r t a � ~a n te of the (Lfectiv�ity o t ~ Gt.t~toms � . e in un , l9'? l1 t o. �t. e � xecution 'the atorestat .),d contr�act h� ws that Lhe 1.>ure of oms has be n aw r since tha tlatinn1n6 of ~ 1 ck t st tutor5 au horit ~o collect 2 52
~CI!:i ~ ...... CT ,f~l'; Nu . c! lt . !; j rr� . tr ch . es o. ex rt ear, � at t.he ;ttort of Da ao; and 4t. hat t olle O~tll! 0 r er Cl .&Ci i n 1D tb t" en 1oned ~ote t $ et. �nl the a 1u1'tl le�a 1ty t ttlo i wit.il>n t :l".S Cl 1'1,', & n u icle � � or e�.x.pol!t t th � �ort ao . ? t. t i onex� app � l �aid � e.1s iG.n t .a r - u ondent on M!lY 51 l .96�9� v:n A ril 7 , 197~ . resp&Jlde.nt o Ccl- neth r o no the �oll.setion of err tra cu.art! oa t ~ c opra up .r:ts of pet1llion.-x at the Port ct � v- 1,.). OUk t e eon a �t r 1 l l ; (.ct) ~h tlle � � not. the rra tr en r r;es in qu atio re re o.na tl � Pe 1t1on r c ntend that t1e c lleot o or t e t Arrastre:.; rv e is n .utno.r1 "e .1lle , 1 , tt s�o ing nQ p:rovJ. 1o.u in the 'l:nritt and c usto s Cod IJ t e rt t av , it ave on o t s in the .hu.�ts 2 53
" J. p "1.1 n i b 1 n vU r � r c r~ 1 cati t c �r 1 :e u 1/l. b �vos1 1 t 1: cr o. t � it 1 r s n pos- tQ 0 w ct 0 u he 1 r \' 1 to t 'IN ' h t a l0 � y of t the tr h b l' rec 0 r t tiel � h t n<:: 1 1t a1 t. r r~ p�r � t. is 0e t.d he in ti 0 t t r 0 t.r ... a he rti l .t'ro �t ort � 1 .. 1 Q . e t f1nu ' p rt 1 s i jl"" .)� 5) 0 t; l:nri & c ,v en re ~ v !fie 2 54
iJEt...IY vN ... ~ A C �~ N � 2 5 wit n e ;supe::Yi$iCio., an nt t' ll Pb.ll.1..,p:ula:i u.pon ba uu~t. c ,.a4� e s.". <i.Ullil 1:n .r~c"' bt; a C:t>o>Jdi~.ttlon r , ~/ Pn � i ir~ � rovid-e i~o:: u.~ r~ ..a~ �� cha ...as on e �port ea.r o at ttl V 1�t � .t Dav Ot w are of ttt& p1nJ.on that t h<a C::�l w:1f 1o.ne-r f Cu to~ , th the r v~l o � tl {)~c.r~t '�1 at )11n&l'iC8; rj bas t .!l .:.:. t.nox; J 1. ./ 4? , 19'73 �) 1 i.:.."liJ/:0 tt:L' ~ ii~tc J t, . ~ . A . f'' 4 ' �rt ~ l l I t iJtJ~. .II V � W1t.l. .;,".'espec 1. t v !, ..:: ~.1!;1 ~ J.g.t;U tit1 r ~,at the a un ~b~ Cntl..t't,IJ 1n U� ion loii) il'l D.Q.t c . � ens - 255
/ 1 hr t � .:.n .r . 1.1- ' 1,-, � 2 56
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5071 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5071)
- ATTY. VOLTAIRE ENRIQUEZ, in his capacity as the City Treasurer of Taguig v. CHRISMON INVESTMENTS, INC.(CTA Case No. AC-323)
- ALLAN U. GARCIA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 2929)
- CTA Case No. 6505 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6505)
- ORIENTAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8817)
- EDISON (BATAAN) COGENERATION CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 735)
- AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION (PHILIPPINES), INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6817)
- EDZEN JOGIE B. GARCIA v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9075)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.