CTA Case No. 587 (Decision)
c LL CIFIC CO .P Y, p ti 1oner, - - v rsus c ��� c o . 587 I 10 0 I .spond n � X - - -- - - - - - - ---X CI I 0 Th re d nt 0 r d e 1 d a ai st c d- llad r P ie Co pany the total s of 2 ,551. 9 t d 1- c1 ncy 1 ax n �anu v neti bind , def'i- c nc dv tX ch r 0 n 0 ro 1 pen lt � re pp al, however, 1 11 it to th dete in tio for 1 br o er's 1 d and p rc nt- X d oU C d d f'1c1 ncy u c r r' s 1 s tax and urc a � h r cts re not 1 put � titio r, Cad 11 r 1 ic Co p (C 1 ' der or r vity), is do ti cor or tion (P � etition for vi w, C1 r c. p. ), t he r1 y purpoo or ch, bodi d in 1 ar 1cle or 1nco 0 tion , is oth r- wi 11 -ro- d d, incid nt to its pri ry urpo ' it 1 PO r 0 oth ��
G.T� � C � 587 - 2- It ha rELnc. of4'1c ( r c ic 0 e 1 y) in ' C lifo nia, 1ted of ric ch v s it buyi ot ice ( ib1t 'i 6, I \ rec � � 3 ). r1 h erio 0 y 1 1 9 o De r 31, 1954 (s Ex! . 5, I r c. p . 19), Cadw ad r sec r d 1 loc custo rs er or t pur- y th atter of ere d � su t to th r e pon, ocab 1 tter r cr to t ;Jr r c or ic dra by t b er 0 p th 0 � copy of t ontr ct, to t h r 1r 1 t te of ' e t to r anch Of i c whi bo t rc d hip h dir ct 0 1 c l c to er n t Phi 1 i 0 it ( nc Of ice) invoice ( h . y ' R rec . p . 3 �' s t n . � 11). h corr PODding
D CISlO .. o. 587 C. 1' � � C - 3- bi 1 0 1 di d oth r hippin d c nts an dr rts dr a n vor or the Br c f i c r for ard d to he b k w ch issu t e 1 t r credit f r ccept- ane and p 0 bt a i tio ot n tur ot th tr a tion b en C l er t loca b Y r , we r prod ce d r h revision or 1 eon- t ct ( c. P� l)h p 1 R r.___ I D T0 o. 54Lzaa D rip io of e c 1 de e � : bl L ter o Cr di 1 vor or rr0 0� � 0 � � 0 t. ort .� � rr
JJf!A;J. ..l.U . - - 4- C� � � C SE t O. 587 AC PT co In .. Ventu t y: n o Co. I l � with- tea- ELL � 2. ' en 3� e- consi- i ord r lt. j in this in u ed nd co~ 1 ions e o 1 ie of th
CI I O .. of th c�� J . C B O. 587 - 5- cure rel n 8. e ...ec rwis n and/or to in o. rest, b nk- nc ount r in r � pu 0 led es .
13 . 14. oureh � II ? of it riv fro th r on~ w: r count d for 1 1 1on . n de � profit ,1d s at nt s "co - � A tho .,h one- 0 th ro its w:
D C IO c.�.. . ~ � cj .. � o. 587 - 7- er dtted in f or of Cad~a n r nd n -ha f in favor of t h Br nc11 Of!'ice , t. hole a d clared inco i n th or~ ~� ?~ilipp n in o e tax re rn ( xh. 1 , .B r ec. , ~� G2 � pt b r � or the p riods ro ~uly 1 19~9 to 3 _, 21, 9; d frc ....ept b r 22, 195.J to , 195 , Ca wal s on ui ran ac :to 1 th ~ ~ount of . ) G, �2 . 22 ~nd 141 , 3 . 70 , r sp c t - 1 l y, or tota o , 25.92 on which r pendent se � d .. ro :-.r ':; er,.. n a ~ nd fi ax , incl 1 e of u r c . �r e, in th a' nnt o 18 0 0. 37 ( . ~ �� 4, BIR r c . , � 3 -J9). 11 der Durin the y ars 1 52 , 1 153 an 1954 , c kin en d in 0 e ti blin s , t heref ro�:n g o 1 s in th~ sp ct v s 0 2 5,.)45. 5 ' l 215, l>7 . 24 li 22 , 136. 32 . B 11 vi 1t e f t abl "' a on r it id h ccrre n in oot p rce t e � � bs p �d nt S $;;~ it or nu r' und r ect1on 186 of th t ion 1 Int rn 1 v n Co e , whi ch, ter de uctin t . e a~ount p ida contr cto 's , a o 'ed to ,701 . 59 ' u of P titio.. for vi ) . 11 d d its it 11 b111ty or perc nt t x on h w les of tb ven i n blinds it ufae tu ed, bu stio s h co ut tion of h t p ri . i t he (s M or nd ~for e J.�tioner , C'l 11 r c � � 51). h u s 'tO resolv~ d hi c r: ) t her o no er t he r n s ds be above c 1 w of i s co ci 1 br ! thin t ur- n ction 194(t) of t l i on 1 1 t rn 1 R Cod �' 33L
., �. ISIOJ - c. c ~ u � 5 !':'~ � � ? -8 l"' co 0 r to t he f1rn is ~ t..a , � h th r or ot Cad 1 1ia 1 for 50, nurc h r for �il 1 a1 ur to . return s a 0 r e i 1 br k ) ) or n t r pond nt's thoc Q_ o putin t he s � 1 t x on t~o ar.u.& .. ncturnd v neti blind is eor re t. j r t J et 1tion for r ic , c l r d or c ipt 01 of r en+- ' r � h t t e co ci .. rok ' s c t., r 0 t l r 949 " qt ,.~ rter o :ow ve ' b 11 v tl t on or t re so 1 ai.l..e a er 0 isc ss and p t sa in t e e o 'Dd 1 1 d .,;. SUD ort i p t i io for r.vi � ~ t h tra.: c :!.on� it r- "" i b t loc l or tr d1 th t ! � On the oth t int i ti n G i to 1 a ons t.~it 11 d c in 5 of ot oc 1 u t r and e1J rs. In st.p.Jort of .li con e-ntiop., r ond n t c t 1i e 0 rr or 4 tl .,.pl contr Ct. ' ( h. ) whic e quot
DECISIO - c . . A. Ct\8" o. 5S7 - 9- th lity nor/ot hr e liP ER, in hich case th p rson CD LLA C lC CO - P shal ot b question d 1n court y th UY or y it a e t an / or represent tive.s . u / The contract o its f c r nt Q inconsis- t c1 � 1 it 1 1 t1f s "In nt Ora o � 'IJ t u m in it app ar n t th p rt1e 1 t n- d d t nt r into in nt tra s ction, it, however, r f rs to t loc 1 cl to r as buy r nd th Branch Of fi ce a s sell r (in th conditio s, s ler or seller /or 1 d ntor), h r by in 1 equ l y p t t that t tr n ction intended 1 o ~.e of pu ell nd 1 � While para ra hs 7, 13 provid or r1gh n favor of C d-walla er in h co c pt of ler, conse- quent1y, n tln perso 'lit of ~dentor or brok r , p ragr ph 14, owev , 11. 1t th~? interv nt1on o d- wa 1 d r 1n th trn s ction to h t o . b ke � view of t h s pp r nt 1 con 1 t nt cont actual provi� ion , we sha 1 1v in o the act 4al conduct of th partie to dete ne t nat r~ of the ransactio s nt r din o {Jrtic, 37 , Civil Code; C vo vs. 0 1ves, et al., 6 P 11. 88; t c, Gu .. P ific co. vs . In ular Gov rn ent., 10 Phil . 1 6; Quiro n v � iar ons t r d r Co . , 38 bil . 50 , 50 ) � A aror stat d, Cadw 11 der s cure orders fro oc 1 custo er tor the pt:..rcha o o The ord r , to ther with irrevoc bl 1 tters o credit dawn by th loc 1 customers , wer . trans itt d tot ch or 1c which bo ht the erch ndi e . The er- chandis wa shipp d by th rane Office on its invoice 336
� �� 7 1 - 0 10 � � 1 � 0 � 1 � ' :l 1 /. 1 t 1 r 0 d/ c t ct or � 00 rr c t �~ t 0 j �i 1 t 11 r �o., �� � 0 � 0 � . ., 7 hi � 3 ' 4") . r 1" t1 co 0 p 11 or 337
-�- - , __ -- uc 0 0 t 1 t let r 1e .. oro t 1 19 ( ) 0 t c0
��� 57 c - 0 r t 1 0 0 t � 57' ) o. � die t t '� s 1 ' � t
0 t 1 1 � ct t -p 0 0 1 ' 1 � . o 1 10 d xp 1
�57 -1 0 0 1 t t 1 � t )' 0 1c t 0 � i ci 95 t t 10 � 1 t 1 0 t � 1P 95 0 ( � t � 3). 1- n0 r 2'
J. �7 - -') � ' ti r' 0s 1 t 0 1 19r.:3 � t � , 0 0 - 1 � l t. 0 r p 1 c 0 1. 1 � or t 0 r t 1' 0 3 '3� l , o. ' DO .o ' � � i c ' t 0 .6 � Yt
. ') . 1 - 0 5 � 34 2
More in CTA Decisions
- DOHLE SHIPMANAGEMENT PHILS. CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1715)
- CTA Case No. 285 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 285)
- CTA Case No. 760 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 760)
- CENTRAL AZUCARERA DON PEDRO, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8459)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. AJ CORINTHIAN HAULING CORPORATION ARCELI S. SAJONAS and JOHN FITZ JERALD CLAUDIO(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-165)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with Case No. 7968)(CTA Case No. 7933)
- TAGANITO MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5634)
- THE PHILIPPINE BANKING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6110)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.