CTA Resolutions CTA Case No. 25102510 1988-11-11
CTA Case No. 2510 (Resolution)
l � <"PUBUC 0 lH. P H,L!PPt;�r. CO~ T i TAX APPE LS QU ZOJ CH' r � V IS - C.T.It. CA:.lE 0. 25 1..1 hi of - � - - ~� � � -- X s 0 UT I 0 Consi 1nc. A rf1 d ��! n ravio� by ttL Cm t t. (' of July r solu~ton Cour 1 t e case lith ri f \ill"" h ld 1t a �y nee on 3 1. 8 de~ itc proper rnt.kP sd edule (.rit on r cc .d1 g � f!SGl �es t.o d1S s- t ~e &:)� e-. titled c,;s:e d l � r.�jw Le for 1 t of nt t i ioners to �osec� e their
.� � �' 0.
More in CTA Resolutions
- KIMWA CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/MR. LEO Y. LUA v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE/BIR REVENUE DISTRICT NO. 98, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY(CTA Case No. 7729)
- GIG-A-SNACKS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND GERRY O. DUMAYAS - REVENUE DISTRICT OFFICER OF RDO NO. 047 EAST MAKATI(CTA Case No. 8303)
- CTA Case No. 1124 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1124)
- CTA Case No. 3532 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3532)
- CTA Case No. 3460 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3460)
- ASURION HONG KONG LIMITED - ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9852)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NEW YORK BAY PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2274)
- TRANS PACIFIC AIR SERVICES CORPORATION VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1407)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.