MONARCH AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY THIRD DIVISION MONARCH AGRICULTURAL CTA CASE NO. 9834 PRODUCTS, INC., Members: Petitioner, - versus - BAUTISTA, Chairperson FASON -VICTORINO, and RINGPIS-LIBAN, JJ. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL Promulgated: REVENUE, Respondent. c.:=:-:-: _-~~1-~~ e.: ~�- ___ -----x X ------------------------------------------ RESOLUTION In its Motion to Withdraw dated June 29, 2018, petitioner informs the Court of its decision not to judicially pursue its claim for refund of excess input value-added tax arising from zero-rated sales subject of the instant Petition. Petitioner will instead exercise the administrative options available to it in claiming such refund. As such, petitioner prays for the withdrawal of the instant Petition for Review. Section 3, Rule 50 of the Revised Rules of Court, in relation to Section 3, 1 Rule 1 of the Revised Rules of the Court of Tax Appeals, pertinently provides: SEC. 3. Withdrawal of appeal. - An appeal may be withdrawn as of right at any time before the filing of the appellee's brief. Thereafter, the withdrawal may be allowed in the discretion of the court. Thus, an appeal, such as the instant Petition for Review, may be withdrawn at any time before the filing of the appellee's brief, or in this case, the Answer by respondent. 1 SEC. 3. Applicability of the Rules of Court. - The Rules of Court in the Philippines shall apply suppletorily to these Rules .
RESOLUTION CTA Case No. 9834 Considering that Summons has yet to issue and no Answer has yet been filed, the withdrawal of the Petition is clearly a matter of right or the part of petitioner. WHEREFORE, the Motion to Withdraw dated June 29, 2018 filed by petitioner is GRANTED. Consequently, the Petition For Review dated May 2, 2018 filed by petitioner Monarch Agricultural Products, Inc. is hereby DEEMED WITHDRAWN. This case is considered CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. LOVE~Ass~~iRat. eBJAuUsTtiIcSeTA QM. ~ J '- MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice
More in CTA Resolutions
- ERS SURPLUS VENTURE, claimant, Shipment of 1x40 Container with No. TEMU743840 STC: Used Parts and Components for Replacement under Import Entry No. C-12566, covered by BL No. SITYKCD2114311 on board the vessel SITC KANTO/21165, which arrived at the Subport of Mindanao Container Terminal, Tagoloan, Misamis Oriental vs. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES(CTA Case No. 10953)
- OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL TREASURER OF BATAAN, REPRESENTED BY THE PROVINCIAL TREASURER, EMERLINDA S. TALENTO, PROVINCE OF BATAAN, WALLY DE LARA DIZON, KRISTINE MONSALE AND REGISTER OF DEEDS OF BATAAN v. BATARASA CONSOLIDATED, INC. ET AL(CTA Case No. AC-205)
- CTA Case No. 2582 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2582)
- CTA Case No. 2347 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2347)
- DOLE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10212)
- BSM CREW SERVICE CENTRE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10135)
- CITCO INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES LIMITED - PHILIPPINE ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9102)
- COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS and BUREAU OF CUSTOMS v. DOLE PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1142)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.