[ G. R. No. 38860. July 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38860. July 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38860
[ G. R. No. 38860. July 07, 1934 ]
RODOCENDO VILLANUEVA ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLANTS, VS. FELISA B, CABRERA , OPPOSITOR AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Batangas________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in this instance against the applicants-appellants.
It is further ordered that the __________the oppositor-appellee _________ from the __________the applicants-appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 123673, June 19, 1997
- [ G.R. No. L-30174. May 31, 1972 ](150-A Phil. 691)
- [ G.R. No. L-45127. May 05, 1989 ](255 Phil. 94; 86 OG No. 47, 8791 (November 19, 1990))
- [ G.R. No. L-44800. April 13, 1978 ](172 Phil. 318; 74 OG 10721 (December, 1978))
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-97-1395. December 22, 1997 ](347 Phil. 696)
- [ G.R. Nos. L-32347-53. December 26, 1973 ](153 Phil. 651; 70 OG 3771 (May, 1974))
- G.R. No. 106947, February 11, 1999
- [ G.R. No. L-21859. September 30, 1924 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.