CTA Case No. 2616 (Decision)
lH�.��� I tC OF 1 H CU �I r ' 1 . X \I P ,; ��..8 QUE-601'; Cl1Y . ' P titionert - ersus "" . --- ~ --. -..---- D C I L I C '& tnis is a petition for the revie" o th e 1 sion of he ""o.ll1L1i�ss1oner of L;Ustoms in Gust m in th:: t of t:L, Colle tor oi ustcms which orC'1eroo thG imposition o~ ~ lc , ooc . co administ ntive ~in or1. the m"' ..if~ste laJ.l Hall cigar ~tes in Viol tion of 10 ~ 5 in� elati to . o ! ion 2 ""'21 the '~h undispute facts or this case are . , iort of Manila on ~ b uary 19 , 1971 from ongkong . It ..sa ere vaa.r hed y t he combined element;:) of tl e l,ater Yatrol and .l�i rs-t i'lnt Inspection 1JiVisicnI . of th<;.' 1. reau o � Cu.5toms .. Th se ch yiel1 d � t ..r nty (2J ) c ses of unmnnif sted blu seal r all l~all cigarettes con t aining fifty ( 5 ) e~ ton
- C B" :1 � 616 each , which wer found in the linen ~om f tn Vt1Ssel . On the a:me a.y , t e t er of the ve 1 a~ r.equi ed to e:Kt""Jlain n wr1 tinf" and s 0\'1 oau e wh no admi nistra tivl:.l fine in t.ba amount of' � lo , OOD . o ' shovJ.o bo imposed on the v . s a. . Hr � ..... . .. . Stengaa �, maste r of the essel , submitted a w? t t ..n e~:~lal"tation 'Wbich t-Jas , however, ow1. u.nsf'lti f a ctory by the Collector Q -f' ustoms . l!onsequ -ntly, on J.! brua y ;~lt , 1971 , administrative rocee in No . � 5 5/7l C'ustorns Case No . 73�139....A} wa s instit't.lted a.ninst the �eo$el ,. � n a JOint �- hear:lng dth ~�he seizur C"'se on the u.nmanif ted cargo ( URtoms Cuse Ifo . 73- 139 L1. r . t o . l2W) , a w .t n .ss f or pQtit _oner n.nd who 1;.:; also tha ._> -.;t Capt f� :J.n of "ompauia. �eneral r Labacos rle �ili inns , lo .. al shin a ent of the said vessel. ,. testified in aef -ns of the ve scl to th e1' ect tha.t the twenty (20 ) eases or � all l11al1 cigar� .,.ttes a.r .or tt e co .su.mpti n �cr;-� t he ~:rew an ar no � su 'P . sec, to b~ landed; th t they were fo1m in the linen :rtoom of t ne vessel wh� cb .1as 'tore ooms -w re beil� pointed at the tim th ves vel ha n j,ust und r rone 'l,--epairs an e Vices in liongk:on � �
.' "" 3 - 0n rl ptember 24, 19?3 , "'t r- the. hea.ringt �th Cc ll!9eto of us to s " a eci~ en im _osing a fine ot . o, ooo . 0 on. the HS 'fM. _l I T HA'FAifJK0 to be cell ct d o he loe~l p g � t . ::.'Ubs u.ently , . tb � Com n1 ssion l" of Custom , unon: a")peal of he case t his :'ice , affi_ ,.o 1!! ~ the deei sion o the olleetor,. vhe:reup n a .. etition or � v1 w""' . f:tl � bzt etit1one:r v.ri trh this ..ourt se king t .he t"-eV1ew of the dee1s o ~ of � th C 1~ ionor O- u toms . The issue to 0 resolved her �in is: whe r liable .~. or 1ol -;ti .n Qf etio 1 v5, 1n elrtir�n � t.c r.eet on 2521 2J3 ( .) o:f the 'l~arii'i' un o Cu:;to s Code , :for carrying unt - ed Pall 1 ~i ar _ttes which 't re t mani� fosteo. o li ted in any of th . hi . ' s documents . It i s noted that th iss e in tili is th& question of wheth0 the a -nistrat ~fine of 10, 0 �.oo should be i osed on the ve sel in u~=. stion , 1 ~ily linke ith th... i u in iss one of .~usto, s , ./.r 't ,;ase ~ o .� 2617 ecidee adversely gainst. ame tit i ner ia our deeis!on a t �p 11 22 1017, Which .affirmed the forfeiture af ~ ~ msni tasted ear.-o . It st. e me.tion oo tbat th etenses aised by the pettt ~net" in th f recit .. c~ e are identical t thos ser te in tn t19 8 .Jl
nr:xa sioo "" '' "' � T , � � J,h t!; NO . � 616 -aviate r ~ 11! ~h<?. r nn1ngs ...."..ld pl'onouneements the � n by this nOUTt , th p-:rtinent portions of � ich sta s , Q r e q ot t l ng th as ollo P t.,~, tiona contends tha.t the '!G 'r!!. �!I � !, :u;nc:� n did not viol, te aid provision of the T rif vusto s Code . It conten that the ) 11 ::.~11 ci.g... etteo 'W ~re or ~ l cons:mzrnti"'n of the ship 1 s _ :rew; that the . ' er w h~-"1d in .f'1 t ennP e 9 C&rt n which was o. part of , d 1n ddi tion to , th 20 us:es .i all Fall cigarettes; and thr.1t the said cig- - tt s vtere n G � i tende - to - " schar ed t th �ort -P �B-l'lila a n the off1c:ere anr:: cr ~w were not foolish to mug.;,:le th cargo o ~ i gar ttes ut the J.d <-la ort � o d , that it ill b subject to nsp tion by the Cust ms autt.orities , and t at con idering tne bi bUlk of sai c~rgo , i 'l"ua.r e~oa :y h~ s e ; .t to .oti... d th ~ss~~ to i~el -e a tne the ei l ar~ c t t es i n' thE~ ves sel t store l.ist, hieh was clai er"'_ t b 1 due to excusable ov ~:rsig t ; r. es ot su j _ � th ves : el to pun shm nt, �P :titi n ~ , owe or, did no" claim th� t the U,I').Tnanif tc"' cigar . t.~.es w:e e place ~ n the p S"" nger b g_g rna, if st r i:t he or ~W ' oecl ru i on . ""n the oth -o1' han(~ , -r - ~P tlent ,o tends th t B d.: t ion l(V' 5 o the Ta.ri �r anc C s ..o Cod e re-.. :L. es ry e el t hrt e ... d whip omplbte an.ifest o"'""' 1 her nc .list of a.ll provisions fo its se ,. .,_ ~ -th :! lul"'e to l1st s id Pall all 1garett e will ,::i vt� 1 ~ :1.ts .,. or... feitu e under t:�cticn 1 00 5, in relation to ~ect:to 253- Jg) ;� t h r. � art�� f and ~ustom ..od � Tna p �rtin{�nt pr vi.sir "'l of dection l "' ry , :;21 nd 253 -{ J o.!' th Tari an s ; o applicabl :in tb1 cuc:e :rc uotcd t.~- s r llows: cargo . 11 of �he c _,.g,., i te'"d to bf" lanc"~ e "t t:-ort in the : hi11p �~ j.n s must Of'] de - crib r 1n sepa nt4 manifests for each port
-; - t O J. .
t:CI � C�� , ASE !0 ._ 616 ... 6 .. �2. i oi nt o ce anii � ent a d dato o '�� 3. Health an . eusto , t th~ last airpo t � ~ d- i el 4. Itin:rar of aicra t :t.n� inf o ati n as to airport o~ ri~in ad ep rtu e a� ; 5. :~ar an�� nation lity ere\� me1:1be. ; 6 . List o p n� 1o ality , pl ace e c! embar an .e-stin tio , � n'i n Je:r a s; ~,ag� ?. Car o man"'.�~st togGrtlle;r with � o ~ion � to ~ e$ f con 1g e � s , thr::i r nu ~1o ali t 1c anc1 th.., r <1dr esse , nam e s an mar of c e , natur o .l 't"'Ods, dentinr:;tion, �roes \voir~ht and vall. e; 8.. 6 tore list . b . 'he g ne:al de 1 ation sh 11 e ~ i~ten in nglish and certified to an~ ~ ly si�~nt-d by h'~ p lo t in c �"imlanf. o cpcrato o~ hiG aircraft or the authoriz c .t . If th~ airCl"'>i't docs not e ar - cargo, ssar rs ox- ili'.migr nts , su�h fa ts mu �t be hovn in th ma:: fest . C4r~ m nife � sn ~1 in n '� e d or a1 e ed :.:. "te:r rcra t , excent by means � o- roncndment by the pilot in c~.nnu.m�l or aut 1orized nt hereof , und .r oath, .J.n ~. t ... ched to :.he riginal m�,mifest: ; rovld~ , bQlt~lYAt 7 fhat af er tn~ inVOiC~ afl ~/0~ PntTy 0 Ver- ing nn i,.portat ion have A~c;n receive and rec rde 1.. the o �fice o :: th{:~ pr ais .r , o amena.ment shall b~ <:..llowcd , �~xc ~~. t when � �<; is obVi s nat~ a .le!" �.e ~l rro 0 . any oth, c'iscrer�f.)ncy 1a.s been conuuittcd i th �ut any e-.ratl.G.Ul~nt 1 te t i.n th pr pr tion of t h(l ma.YJ.i e st, u1scov .ry -r 'hi h could n t h v . been ma. e, until af't' r exanrl nation o f tho impor tation has co, 1 te'l �. 5-0 1
D..~CIUIO~ - � G.,. .. A.'�'~~ N .. d616 .. ? - d q . U..wani !:>estr, art ~J :t UJ.~d on any .el 0 ir r ~t if n fest th>r rter . e u-1 XXX e n< t l"'le~r . In an an logou$ cigarette 1er �� found 1 an...c.f st ~ ai.;l p:;~ t o .."' the e go, ntained in the 1 st of the ship ' s or , d there was no c aim that th w i eluded in h p s~ ng �:r b .ge ge . 1 fe t o 1 he cre~r ' s d elaratic � e. t ' <i Gou..~... t reason, bly inferrt~'i therefrom , th t the c ga:rettes ''er. u:.:1111a..'1if t ea ~o an affi .ed the eeinion of th ~� nn iss oner of Cu..~toms holdin thr.- ci ~ar ettes sub rae to forfei tu.re for viola.tio of '~ ctirn 1C(,51 in "'lntion to ne t io 2 53U(g) of the 1., iff d vustom .od ~ , ( Yu t Nilsen , r"t d1 . , v � Th 'o...lroission r 0 u to s, vTA ., e i: � 156$, iJec ' e 1!3, 1,66, s,. . �lso . tf> en . a Shi � ing ..orp � or.h. :re t of ,'S 'Bunni. tl) V � vO!irtissioner 1U;:)...q ' vf.N. ';.;t e :r"'o . 11.-3 , �~ pt mb 3 '
l)EC1 'IO:r; .. � ,.� � AS.w � 2616 .. a - '>. �I 1967) for b it unmanif' e ted. e �. :go , eitin th<=- cases o ,J ., .., . v � l las :?ilip ns , 28 -'h11 . ':} , an U, � , vs . ~ Ubi , 3~ 'ltil . , 0 � , 241 . Tb1. Co 1rt anne~ evi te -r m the' rational in th� b J,�c t decision in the ea e o4' - t lsPn Pt - 1 . , ~mu::a , which is qu t d h stion. ot "'all Hall an e. 503
ur c)nsi r a., t . r_1 cj.. io 0h OQ ..u.-toms i h r by .f 'i med � . �csts gttinst j iticnf.!�' . 1t 1
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 6176 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6176)
- CTA Case No. 4783 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4783)
- CTA Case No. 5255 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5255)
- CTA Case No. 2231 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2231)
- AYALA LAND INTERNATIONAL SALES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9262)
- MAIBARARA GEOTHERMAL, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with 8937, 8999 & 9042)(CTA Case No. 8871)
- TAGANITO MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8090)
- ANTHONY ORTILE TUASON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9041)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.