[ G. R. No. 37550. May 26, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37550. May 26, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37550
[ G. R. No. 37550. May 26, 1934 ]
GERONIMA LAROSA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, DAMASO LAROSA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________10th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________La Union________, dated the __________15th__________ day of __________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , reversed and the appellant acquitted, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________recover from ___________the appellant___________the sum of P__________, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-44317. October 20, 1977 ](169 Phil. 493; 74 OG 3789 (May 15, 1978))
- [ G.R. No. L-15778. April 23, 1962 ]
- G.R. No. 120468, August 15, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 179571. July 02, 2014 ](738 Phil. 135)
- [ G.R. No. L-19890. May 21, 1969 ](138 Phil. 228)
- [ G.R. Nos. 14468 and 14469. September 12, 1919 ](G.R. Nos. 14468)
- G.R. No. 117247, April 12, 1996
- [ G.R. No. 42868. April 17, 1935 ](G.R. No. 42868)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.