CTA Case No. 187 (Resolution)
BSPUBLIC GOURT OF MANDA TAX APPEAI ThE PIALIP INS
JOVEN C. LAUBEL Potitioner:
- versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 137
OF MANILA. CONMISSIONER OF CUSTCMS and COLLECTOR OF CUSTONS Respondonts.
RESOLUTICN
This is in conncstion with potitioner's Motion
to Dismiss" to which reapondent interposod no objection.
The said motion states no reanon why potitioner
prays for the dismissal of his petition for review.
Howover, the records show that petitionor prwviouoly
manifosted in opan oourt his dosire to oettlo tht case
amicably with the Commissioner of Custons.
WhEafrQie, there being no objection interposed
thareto on the part of respondeut. and finding the
*Motion to Dioniss" in order. tho smue is herehy grented.
The petition for reviaw filed in tho above-entitled
case is hereby dinmisaed, without pronouncenont as to
Gosts.
SO ORDERED
Manila, Decenbor i0, l960.
Presiding Judge MAAIANONATLE
D Cn e
Aoaotiato Judgm ROMAN M ALI Aaaociate Judge CIR
3 25
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 1166 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1166)
- Spouses RODOLFO M. LEJANO & ALICIA P. LEJANO v. THE HON. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6722)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. IRENEO B. PANGANIBAN and BRAND BENEFITS ADVERTISING INC. 12F Unit 1JK, Future Point Plaza, Mother Ignacia Street, South Triangle, Quezon City -AT-LARGE-(CTA Case No. O-747)
- BENCHMARK MARKETING CORP., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2212)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. LUCKY FORT FOOD VENTURES, INC., (Quadrant Space 1F05/1F06 BGC Retail Promenade City Fort Bonifacio, Ususan, Taguig City) ROBERTO V. GARCIA and (No. 8 Sparrow Street, Green Meadows, Quezon City) VALERIE ANNE G. MALIG,(U-1065 Skyway Tower, Pasig City) -all at large-(CTA Case No. O-815)
- OCEANAGOLD (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9772)
- JGC PHILIPPINES INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7498)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ARMEL PLASTIC CO., INC./DENIS LAWRENCE V. LIPIO, and ELIZAH ANNE M. LIPIO(CTA Case No. O-725)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.