CTA Case No. 1625 (Resolution)
: . 16 5 of- i t n� o� t. th .' 0 .� < 99
. '� 6 - -, 2 ons, nc�.. , . 1. b t 0' n rrt nal 1 0 tion t uetion. ~ (in I r'l tlo 1r�d �� ..n:. . , "' � ttt on r fil "� for e11 w, ~-on r .t I te n to on t cf 1 o of ju tn tot1on ov .ov1. 1 on ' ot t 0 t ' ~ .publ c of t , .1 p1 r f ~1'. rr t th to t r ' nt ,. ( n a d t> ti ' t '?� t Jt c.> i c re� i: a !'ol.lo :r 100
, _ 3 .. 1ty fro .. e:ver:y for at ci; l pr0c~~ doos not <nQ de- 01 tha ..,o~:St � ~r~J&itl$n t , but -~: l :o Ui.rCn �,.,bf~" cc.rti:f'1ca... tion or t ~a veers �ry of l o ait;;n ..,ffair& ( P � 63 �. ' onl~" be \r..�. i vc1 xp.rcf'!nly t�nf not 't!' ncr(\ itt_p ic!l - tion�,� un.~ (3 ) a., cure1 r.....,.:, nnco ar!�~. A 011 ... �'"', t L.t t: ��~:c lQ~. �vliod ., 1v td i t :: ir.r:.lu.~:.it l<thOtl t cntcr"'-d !:1tc contJ:act with petit oner, tba v r not b e:.1~ta .. t:ad 0 tb~ sf ,r o C'Jntton~~ contrac t 'A~ith pet1 tloncrl r as ; (Ht d- .. t -~<Jt0 1m~ l:t tUr'l 'I ~..ta t"�ta:d it.. im_f,'ltloi /f frc �\4 r.>J.t t . ~.,~- 1tion .,r !"urth r e ntonds that , in ntorin 1nto s�- 1,.: coatr,;- ct, rec pond nt �H01 b-:.:1nt1' ware o its diplo ~ ... 101
, a mtlo � 't � nn e .. , tion o .1orlJ � ' I' r e ' p t t1o r t n .ann t1 n ith t ona � t..lotion of n htr<;;i"ora , t 1.-2 �on . t f�A~ c:: -~ 0 i1..,... e n- t ot i " ln'l wit ')') itio ~ ' , J. i lt.:� ii.) ~ a. e., . t l- t \ t� .. o , att ' 96" i .; a. self- or Court 0 t -~ t p l c i t.v i t l t1on r' , pp . t _- 4 � , nu �~ joi . ' p � 67-?1 , ~ ./1 1.)' on i r nt 1 ''� f a o ~ n ' o ~;ion n .t the contr� at tb ction or in .. r t ' � ~ to 1 102
H~~OL:lrn!oli ... t;;r CA::.H5 o . 625 '- ... nt t r-s r 1 t e tb r to , wn iob ll wlth- in t h x.cl ppe late ,3ttr1sd1ation of th - sp cif 1�" in dttction 1 of' JUl lto y tb t, � t C'llf t' e Ooauni.ssio .er of . n t r 1 v n.t , Conn 1as1onsr o.f Cus t ome ad tr '>ro.v nuia � '1 su � b f re til .:i Court ' e,- �'< s) (Dy P n /o t/ict.ory . ttbb r ,.�r,. . , :; . flll . o I nt r ��), R v nu , , nd C r :r o � c 1m City , C'ttlt No. 5'i d, J n. -3 t 59) . r� fl"'o , � nd for the \li t 1dr wal f' th , B sosa nt it tn h s or 6,970�.lto.. I1 VJ. f'l) 01 'tH;~ .'OR i.t l!iiO CuNSID~~RI\TlOt ~J, the ot:ton t o 1 m!_ , s f r as t1e re4'ponden t �{o::rld 1 (13
, � io co ' � c 5. 10 11
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 4384 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4384)
- ASIAN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8476)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LAPANDAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1888)
- CF SHARP CREW MANAGEMENT, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10228)
- MAXIMA MACHINERIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9453)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10730)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1921)
- SUMISETSU PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 871)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.