CTA Case No. 341 (Decision)

assess ent, p tlt r i in n 1 .Jan y l � 57. T r� 1 te yin car t1 r 1 store t tc X h n paid. c r ct $ f t � nt f t X n n� alty so collect n n 11 427 L/-b ~ *I ftt-1

� r � 11 r n Ll � y � cl � 1 s tl29 t.f. I

n 1 1 t 0 nt "c r tr nt r � n n- t l f r t r pl ' 0t l r f ti ich nt t ct f ... �� v tl n t t - 1 0 c - � � 1 c .. pir � it p 1t t fy t' r tr Lf ti30

1 .. 6- � ...,.. of ..cb �c truarul� 9 � 1n bt� �'~�� at!ti , vt~. 4ld oeltbe� despltt he� la M of t!M f:t the cU.Mow~y thtfttt f tnd h4t ..lat~H of t c �� The only 1 l�al ��XJ>l�� ation f ls, t� that, 1t av. OWl~ of tbe af. . . .ntt. M play.tn tucls ancl hls � t � t!v�tect � 11M y an �u11o itb ce.,.ct to all ee A \ convJMect t t t ..ld. .,_, twn exists. In hia decluatlOAs ~Ntfae tbe P�t Pevol ffS..eJ."a (Exhu-it 2, � 11 .ne.) � petttlonu- aa.td \hat t � �� l01t 1, ���� left by f the off1ctre of � ta�, o told !a (.-tl ienu) that 1� -. la � eye� � is ln t tak� t at back ft�~ a few de~.� ellalnt t !Dirtd~tllty of aa1 atat nt, ...J--;~vn� wUl D t an st t a v~tual str&RgeJ." a patt �� valu le �� xK~lt 1, Pftttton�� in ope � lar that he � kn tb� al- �� y an tba u three uan- � lens wlt petit~'� � siderlng tMt petitt h.acl J�� tine�� only a n estlf14td 1n n �ou April 22, 9~7 ( t. '�"� � 2) � f!Dd 1\ difft.ult \o 11� be lleg _.o . ,., ����ral tha Mfozoe ApzU 1 ,19&6 that t.. haa acl ..wJ."al uaAucti � wtth the la tar.

�1 � 7- llk ca not y:lve h 1 t tt) � rr ' 11 t 1 ntity f 0 'y �itlng � xh t 1 � t1t1 r. .y n n y hi� � - � d� nv t nt a �� ln 1� life suo as ny f hl fh � c:ia � o b f.r "'l of t '(; l ::.w ch1!d::en? {t.'~.n. � _.... � ) n nt 't ll�:r c � t� pt r na � i� t te � - t r �� � Y� 1 h y � i. 1 any X L � � � t � � te 1 tt �� c llu'� stat ts �� true?

-. l � � � � y - � nd case may warrant. 433

f. r u: 431