[ G. R.. No. 35798. March 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R.. No. 35798. March 10, 1934 ]
G. R.. No. 35798
[ G. R.. No. 35798. March 10, 1934 ]
ARTEMIO DE LOS SANTOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT VS. MACARIO RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________28th__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that _________the appellee___________ recovers from __________the appellant__________ of the sum of _________P40.00_________ as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 247824, February 23, 2022
- [ G.R. Nos. 122757-61. November 28, 1997 ](346 Phil. 985)
- [ G.R. No. 164521. December 18, 2008 ](595 Phil. 265)
- [ G.R. No. L-22027. July 31, 1973 ](152 Phil. 153)
- [ G.R. Nos. 53001-56. June 18, 1987 ](235 Phil. 65)
- G.R. No. 180098, April 02, 2014
- [ G.R. No. 181809. February 17, 2010 ](626 Phil. 823)
- [ G.R. NOS. 149158-59. July 24, 2007 ](555 Phil. 42)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.