CTA Case No. 2258 (Decision)
'" < I) I it fol 1 1 � 11 1 \ r , J�.\ 1.~ ~~ : Zil�' :11 Y ti () r-, c.r. � c � c tl I~I }::Y~ I - - - - - - ... ... .... .... I1 it1o 1 I' of 0 t , .a ' nt ri 1 1 r t. 1 r1 i .0 o. 0 221 9 . 15 196 � c h r 0 r ?, 1 J ' 1� t r, o , r 197 1, 0 18, r 297
,... 2 lt,. 'fh.at n ree ivf)d ~al.~ 1 t r of r fUnd a !3.mttt by h in par . 1 or hi a an w r d �t d. June 11, 197' to th 1nst �1t f t! t:to. ; s.. Ti P~tJ tion .r has t .r- e tv_ ny r ply o his :r turA t~qu at from R�..... spa, d .~t t ~11 1 "dmittEK\ by hi~ 1n r . or hi . An r t~d J n 11 � 19?1 to �th in$t.an f' t~. tion; 6 . Th h. 1 1:.~ti t1on � s t11$'1 on A.pr t 1 3t 1971 tt11 thin t ht? r �, gl~~ntar-:r ~ ri.C'..d f'i :x by WJ pu lie .Ae �<> � 5 1 p~11 to p t t!on r rr"ot1v� July 1, 1968. 1 t o"l~l' claim tl'...a t 1 a -.Xi ...pt!on troo. ta - t1on :tblic . et ' � ~� .31. � i t . .X ... .. �j w of ~- Q ton 1 � o� pn'bl.lc Aet 1c ., S't31 .ioh p-l'ovi,le.. th.at th provi. ton ot &n!d not "CJ~ 11 apply 1n e f r t 298
.. . �.... n 0t R1 ' of CanJ l1n -llC . l v. r . �"t 197 ) th t CT c � 2 1t 0 � 1 in o. � �� I:. I'll t e e r 1, 1 6 t h � ,' , hr p 1on r � 72 ' l 1 tor u 1 th� R. lie c � ' ion � t� u0 r t r� 0 , tt-1 � A hi 299
... eD ClSlON ... n;a ~ CAStt' gqc. u ly p 18 by th � ~ tt~r � d r~ ei no,y 1neem ~ t � f'o:r 1968. tlo eo~;t.. . S0 Oft!) R'r.'D .. on Cit !' , t'1ovtJeb~r 21 � 19?1t. ~~~~ RC~' H .,,. � ID~AL1 Pttesidtng Ju~g � COACt. = �>KI~~/e.~~ A soe1at uc; ~ 11--- ~-~- 300
More in CTA Decisions
- LANTRO PHILS. INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10130)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CARGILL PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1986)
- CTA Case No. 784 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 784)
- KEPCO ILIJAN CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 611)
- ECCO ASIA NACAP NEDERLAND BV (JOINT VENTURE) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6595)
- SAN MIGUEL FOODS, INC. v. OFFICE OF THE CITY TREASURER, CITY OF DAVAO, represented by BELLA LINDA N. TANJILI, City Treasurer(CTA Case No. AC-209)
- CTA Case No. 5350 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5350)
- MAXIMA MACHINERIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2054)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.