[ G. R. No. 38836. June 18, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38836. June 18, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38836
[ G. R. No. 38836. June 18, 1934 ]
DOMINGO CANSINO, ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLEES, VS. LEONARDA GUZMAN ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________30th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellees_________ from the __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 66646. April 15, 1988 ](243 Phil. 694)
- G.R. No. 141237, September 17, 2002
- [ G.R. No. 106858. September 05, 1997 ](344 Phil. 90)
- [ G.R. No. 122046. January 16, 1998 ](348 Phil. 334)
- [ G.R. No. 56769. September 21, 1984 ](217 Phil. 103)
- [ G.R. No. L-3541. May 31, 1950 ]
- G.R. No. 237063, July 24, 2019
- [ G.R. No. 4005. February 03, 1908 ](G.R. No. 4005)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.