[ G. R. No. 38730. May 14, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38730. May 14, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38730
[ G. R. No. 38730. May 14, 1934 ]
CANDELARIA SISON ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLANTS, VS. ULAM CRUZ ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________11th__________ day of _________August____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost in this instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 7321. November 05, 1912 ](G.R. No. 7321)
- G.R. No. 177761, April 18, 2012
- [ G.R. Nos. 138404-06. January 28, 2003 ](444 Phil. 362)
- [ G.R. Nos. 131818-19. February 03, 2000 ](381 Phil. 646)
- G.R. No. 115412, November 19, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 84847. March 05, 1993 ](292 Phil. 539)
- [ G.R. No. 2695. March 26, 1906 ](G.R. No. 2695)
- [ G.R. No. L-4020. July 31, 1952 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.