[ G.R. No. L-35992. February 25, 1975 ]
[ G.R. No. L-35992. February 25, 1975 ]
← click for PDF copy
EN BANC
[ G.R. No. L-35992. February 25, 1975 ]
LEONOR S. LITTON AND ROGELIO M. PAZ, PETITIONERS, VS. HON. B. JOSE CASTILLO, PROVINCIAL FISCAL OF RIZAL, HON. VICENTE ABAD SANTOS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF JUSTICE, AND GEORGE LITTON, SR., RESPONDENTS.
R E S O L U T I O N
ANTONIO, J.:
Considering that Presidential Decree No. 77 issued by the President of the Republic of the Philippines on December 6. 1972 pursuant to Proclamation No. 1081 dated September 21, 1972, and General Order No. 1 dated September 22, 1972, amending Section 1 of Republic Act No. 5180 (Prescribing a Uniform System of Preliminary Investigation by Provincial and City Fiscals and their Assistants and by State Attorneys or their Assistants), the validity of which is being questioned in the present petition for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, now forms part of the law of the land (Article XVII, Section 3 [2] of the new Constitution) the court Resolved to DENY the petition for lack of merit.
Makalintal, C.J., Barredo, Makasiar, Esguerra, and Aquino, JJ., concur.
Fernando, J., concurs on the ground of its prerogative validity.
Castro and Teehankee, JJ., concur in the result.
Fernandez, J., took no part.
Muñoz Palma, J., on leave.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. Nos. 131837-38. April 02, 2002 ](429 Phil. 540)
- G.R. No. 181174, December 04, 2009
- G.R. No. 106858, September 05, 1997
- [ G.R. No. L-23954. April 29, 1977 ](167 Phil. 287)
- [ G.R. No. 129695. March 17, 1999 ](364 Phil. 439)
- [ G.R. No. 199344. March 05, 2014 ](728 Phil. 527)
- [ A.C. No. 9257 (Formerly CBD Case No. 12-3490). March 05, 2018 ](827 Phil. 1)
- [ G.R. No. L-7953. February 27, 1956 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.