CTA Case No. 1636 (Decision)
\J , ; �1 ( ... �- 1 17~13 1 195?, f CJ� t t 1 it ton s con 10 t 1 1 n. en t d 1 1 � t 1 c t rr 144
p t1 1 Ol' ot h lt e !t r ~� 1 c! :I 20, t lrty- ar r,. :rt p lie � 112 cu t h' tor , ' 1 1 t rfr 0 th � t CCI'! t1 ~ e .r~t ot th1 l ru. 0 la n1 � r n, 1. 1 1 ,~. 1 . 1 tW' line of lf11 (a) or tl b n - t (b) 0 y !. ttr tur 1 s1o � J' t 1 r ir t � n �s ac ounti t t n t 0 i .ts t~:h~t l l ou 0 of he sl ' ii n t tnco : :~
16 .3 or . r i 1 e 1 '~~~'� ....~ 1 ~ qul" � u ro nt 1~- n h.t . 1t ot 1 I � b- � Q � 1� ootta� r of G h~ jlj ... r,. lf . 1. 1 �1 � , un 1 r y., t' 01 .tl/ it 1e whiW: i:a ttl ot 1 1 o� G. ' 1 it t 04& t t. 1r.tG , � 19~7� , � 1t1 1" . 11 t � .. � 1 � s. rc t h fer b J.eh d ' t 1"0 ln t~o fi 61 1 1�� $ adlf! t � , t protit bt ..ot t r tb 'l' s 1 xes ln .. 1 l, 1la � tl' tl � Uow, � t 146
��� � � � _a. , "-.~31. . f';o - ' � � � ~ � � � a � ~ ~1.) 1,1 11 c' as in 1 s 1 9, 8 ao l 0 ca 1d orr 81 t 1 � b., -1 w o :HI "" '. � 1 to t ro s i 't 2 - - - -!II" -- .. i� 147
� l63 f 'h r r t: n t it �1 or n .eY n lo ll of th :r t of e t i , G t 30;, 6C . 9, � t 3'.)" ' 802 .1 (. ' t s or th t Di ion. :tr.:va - , en t ... r eo d , t' ...lly 1 qu st .n 1'1 �7 . ' p a n~tn 't1c n, 1'?1 21t-. 3 t . 1?,... c.). 133 � � . ( � t 1 onl4" th i!UO~.;i llity of d"'"t co .n.aa 0 0 e r: of.\t r 61 '16 �. 41+ of' t .,. g ~on � to t t 1- tAi. e ' 0 0 . 51'?3 � t ro .. .r . c ff' c s� 148 �
l>!- .taio ... c Ct. ,. 1 ~lh 11' 6 ( ntio r eo ns t.J.on ov rn 3' 0 t. L' c � CCI� Q Oi' a!tio OJ' b r d to 'io r r.d Of l n .:r ..r1 � ls, U.t: e.r Sec 1 n IJV nte . +-d \. b.v " Q' u ion I c l t ' 1tt ' �{ 1 ) o!' 'le onuoe ifl t: ct "'o. or..al. vie ll~t r . nd {3) bo s s, n .o th r1 r r _d y lit r- ~"'o r I;~ lat1(r to th.�e u iness t ... ti r{<J .nzl e ff' � 1 ,.., Ho � 12V1 tl L- 2H3 t "'� or �u~ r t on an o 1 c 1 ~c� y �o t te � 73 U� .'~ . L. 2(2}. (I t htt t pr 1 , ,1 o. in qu rro 0h hJrtti.nglUI lot tor t rn t r 1�e to tish et Th .reoor. bOW$ t ... l �" � ed, t: . y ti � io r ro. r e. i i n :51 , 123 � 12 for 1e r~ 0 ' )' 14 9
' .... .. � � 1 150
�' t 0 � . "'� - � � .. � 151
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5426 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5426)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FIRST BALFOUR, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2116)
- MIRANT SUAL CORPORATION (Formerly Southern Energy Pangasinan, Inc. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with CTA En Banc Case No. 387)(CTA Case No. EB 364)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATED SMELTING AND REFINING CORPORATION (Consolidated with CTA En Banc Case No. 342)(CTA Case No. EB 338)
- POWER SECTOR ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8475)
- CTA Case No. 1618 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1618)
- PROCTER & GAMBLE ASIA, PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 746)
- CTA Case No. 2484 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2484)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.