[ G. R. No. 40416. July 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40416. July 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40416
[ G. R. No. 40416. July 07, 1934 ]
ANTONIO CHIPECO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. JUAN BANAYBANAY, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Laguna________, dated the __________31st__________ day of __________May_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from ___________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 201167. February 27, 2013 ](705 Phil. 294)
- [ G.R. No. L-31394. January 23, 1970 ](142 Phil. 55; 66 OG 3730 (April, 1970))
- G.R. No. 117051, January 22, 1996
- G.R. No. 128820, December 23, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 7567. November 12, 1912 ](G.R. No. 7567)
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-11-2289 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 11-3656-RTJ). March 08, 2023 ](937 Phil. 581)
- [ G.R. No. 35236. April 05, 1932 ](G.R. No. 35236)
- [ G.R. No. 82272. February 07, 1990 ](261 Phil. 151)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.