CTA Case No. 505 (Decision)
-- � 1\EPUBLit.. 0 THE l llll:.IP.t'INJ:I:ll COURT OF 11 . APPEAL." UANIJ...A .. r � I �' � � ('I\ n � 1 1 X� � � � � � � � � � � � X 1 1 I CI I fh c t 1 ~t p ' 1c f 1 6, � lu n � Tr � � y 21 , 1 6, 0 .~: , � � 11 tax e urn f ,� rs Of t! !one t.�'i;O�'"'""""'"'"' 1 ll !n P 1n �� y ��������������� y ��������������� l 1 u~ s ��������� I rar ������������������� r �ary 1 � 19 , e it!o � x:. bl 0 t c . . hol c � 11 310
. �� t f1 ��������� �������� 1 ��������� � �� ��� � ��� �� �� , � � ��� � �� .. � � �� � �� � 7, .. 311
., t - � ... ! ' � f 31 2 ,
l au . .. t 1 I ... � � �. �'> �� 313 \I "� ~)/
t t f � r t. 1 / f 11 l� J. � l '� 0 � - �
~ - 6- ct t �� � p 1 1 9. ~ .. � ,. ' / ' .. � 315
More in CTA Decisions
- SONOMA SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7757)
- SAN MIGUEL PAPER PACKAGING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2099)
- FIRST LEPANTO TAISHO INSURANCE CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6199)
- CTA Case No. 1325 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1325)
- PANAY POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 666)
- CTA Case No. 4346 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4346)
- PRO STAR SPORTS PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11037)
- CARGILL TEXTURIZING SOLUTIONS PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8172)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.