CTA Case No. 3049 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THr� PHILIPPJN&a COURT OF TAX APPf.A.U ot:&7.0N CITY L D�� - I ~ I 1 VI HI �c� oL. T. D� � �� TD IA 0 Petitio ra. - ersu - c��� c o. 3049 0I -X � X- ~ ~ - ~ - - - - ~ 0L 10 cting on petitioners� � otio 0 1 fil d n Jun s. 1 1 n the g o t t th ir cla.i for tax ere t i the a of 30.642 . 5 involved here..: in h d alrea y en approv y the ur a of Intern 1 venue. aa evidenced y Credit Me a . � 30 and 31 � in t � reapectiv a P2 . 123. 1 or a tot 1 o� P30. 642 . s. both ated Dece r � � 19 o. and t r beinq objectio on h art of rea en � th id motion ia ereb A D. ecordinqly. let the tition for review ee d 51
OLUTI C A CAS� 0 . 3049 .. 2 - withdr�wn nd the abov -entitled e se considered elose4 en ter ineted. SO D �D. ue on City. June 11. 19 1 . 52
More in CTA Resolutions
- FOUNDEVER PHILIPPINES CORPORATION (formerly SITEL PHILIPPINES CORPORATION) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2710)
- CTA Case No. 2924 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2924)
- PARITY PACKAGING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8825)
- CTA Case No. 1477 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1477)
- CTA Case No. 1357 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1357)
- LAPANDAY AGRICULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10072)
- CTA Case No. 6381 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 6381)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PET PLANS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2857)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.